Scientific Reports of the National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine

Technological solutions for improving the welfare of gestating sows in group housing

Vadym Lykhach, Leonid Lenkov, Anna Lykhach, Volodymyr Reznichenko, Rostyslav Faustov
Download article
Abstract

Modern pig breeding is focused on improving the welfare of sows by optimising housing conditions and introducing natural feed additives with hepatoprotective effects. The aim of the study was to determine the effect of the complex feed additive “Gepasorbex” on the behavioural reactions of gestating sows. The experiment was carried out under conditions of group housing of animals in industrial conditions of the private-rental enterprise “Victoria” (Mykolaiv region). The experiment was carried out on 62 heads of two-breed sows (Large White × Landrace), inseminated by boars of the terminal line “Maxter”. The sows were divided into three groups: control (basic diet), experimental II (basic diet + 0.15 % “Gepasorbex”) and experimental III (basic diet + 0.15 % commercial analogue). Behavioural responses were assessed using video monitoring (Mobotix 6MP network camera) for two weeks. It was found that the addition of the feed additive “Gepasorbex” to the diet contributed to a decrease in motor activity (186.5 min in experimental group II vs. 289.2 min in the control group, p ≤ 0.001), an increase in rest time (by 4, 18-6.41 % more compared to the control, p ≤ 0.01) and a decrease in stereotypical behaviour, in particular fictitious chewing (decrease by 120.2-131.1 min, p ≤ 0.001) and hunger indication (by 109.0-111.8 min, p ≤ 0.01). The use of “Gepasorbex” as a functional feed additive for gestating sows has demonstrated its effectiveness in improving their behavioural profile, which confirms the feasibility of using natural hepatoprotectors in programmes to improve animal welfare. The results of the study indicate that the inclusion of mycotoxin adsorbents in the diet helps to reduce stress reactions, increase the comfort of keeping and the overall welfare of sows. The data obtained can be used to optimise technological solutions in industrial pig production systems

Keywords

mycotoxin adsorbents, pig welfare, video monitoring, group housing, feed components, feed additive

Suggested citation
Lykhach, V., Lenkov, L. , Lykhach, A., Reznichenko, V., & Faustov, R. (2025). Technological solutions for improving the welfare of gestating sows in group housing. Scientific Reports of the National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, 21(2),61-74. https://doi.org/10.31548/dopovidi/2.2025.61
References
  1. Departmental norms of technological design: Pig enterprises (complexes, farms, small farms). (2005). Retrieved from https://lugdpss.gov.ua/images/bezpechnist_veterynariya/Svynarski-pidpryyemstva-VNTP-APK-02.05.pdf.
  2. Do, S., Jang, J.-C., Lee, G.-I., & Kim, Y.-Y. (2023). The role of dietary fiber in improving pig welfare. Animals, 13(5), article number 879. doi: 10.3390/ani13050879.
  3. Domingos, R.L., et al. (2024). Use of a precision feeding program during gestation improves the performance of high-producing sows. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 311, article number 115969. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2024.115969.
  4. Faustov, R., Lykhach, V., Lykhach, A., Shpetny, M., & Lenkov, L. (2022). Effect of a new complex mycotoxin adsorbent on growth performance, and serum levels of retinol, tocopherol and 25-hydroxycholecalciferol in pigs fed on mycotoxin-contaminated feed. Online Journal of Animal and Feed Research, 12(1), 107-113. doi: 10.51227/ojafr.2022.2.
  5. Feyera, T., Hu, L., Ekildsen, M., Bruun, T.S., & Theil, P.K. (2021). Impact of four fiber-rich supplements on nutrient digestibility, colostrum production, and farrowing performance in sows. Journal of Animal Science, 9, article number skab247. doi: 10.1093/jas/skab247.
  6. Huang, S., Wei, J., Yu, H., Hao, X., Zuo, J., Tan, C., & Deng, J. (2020). Effects of dietary fiber sources during gestation on stress status, abnormal behaviors and reproductive performance of sows. Animals, 10, article number 141. doi: 10.3390/ani10010141.
  7. Ibatulin, I.I., & Zhukorskyi, O.M. (2017). Methodology and organization of scientific research in animal husbandry. Kyiv: Agrarian Science.
  8. Islas-Fabila, P., Roldán-Santiago, P., de la Cruz-Cruz, L.A., Limón-Morales, O., Dutro-Aceves, A., Orozco-Gregorio, H., & Bonilla-Jaime, H. (2024). Importance of selected nutrients and additives in the feed of pregnant sows for the survival of newborn piglets. Animals, 14(3), article number 418. doi: 10.3390/ani14030418.
  9. Jang, J.C., & Oh, S.H. (2022). Management factors affecting gestating sows’ welfare in group housing systems – a review. Animal Bioscience, 35, 1817-1826. doi: 10.5713/ab.22.0289.
  10. Jensen, M.B., Pedersen, L.J., Theil, P.K., & Bach Knudsen, K.E. (2015). Hunger in pregnant sows: Effects of a fibrous diet and free access to straw. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 171, 81-87. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.011.
  11. Kramarenko, A., Yulevich, O., Lіuta, I., & Kramarenko, S. (2024). Analysis of variability in gestation length in sows and its association with litter traits at birth. Scientific Horizons, 27(11), 9-20. doi: 10.48077/scihor11.2024.09.
  12. Kramarenko, S.S., Lugovoy, S.I., Lykhach, A.V., & Kramarenko, O.S. (2019). Analysis of biometric data in animal breeding and selection. Mykolaiv: MNAU.
  13. Kramer, T., nin, D.G., Tomasi, P.H.D., Fireman, A., Fernandes, S.R., Teixeira, A.P., & Alberton, G.C. (2023). Prevalence and severity of claw lesions in sows in intensive systems in Brazil. Semina: Ciências Agrárias, 44(1), 301-316. doi: 10.5433/1679-0359.2023v44n1p301.
  14. Krogh, U., Bruun, T.S., Poulsen, J., & Theil, P.K. (2016). Impact of fat source and dietary fibers on feed intake, plasma metabolites, litter gain and the yield and composition of milk in sows. Animal, 11, 975-983. doi: 10.1017/S1751731116002585.
  15. Ladyka, V.I., & Khmelnychiy, L.M. (Eds.). (2023). Technology of production and processing of livestock products: A textbook for graduate students. Odesa: Oldi+.
  16. Lopez, M., Pacheco, E., & Salak-Johnson, J. (2021). Dietary fiber source and length of feeding partitions differentially affected behavior, immune status, and productivity of group-housed dry sows. Agriculture, 11, article number 34. doi: 10.3390/agriculture11010034.
  17. Meunier-Salaun, M.C., Edwards, S.A., & Robert, S. (2001). Effect of dietary fiber on the behavior and health of the restricted-fed sow. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 90, 53-69. doi: 10.1016/S0377-8401(01)00196-1.
  18. Order of the Ministry for Development of Economy, Trade and Agriculture of Ukraine No. 224 “On Approval of Requirements for the Welfare of Farm Animals During Their Keeping”. (2021, February). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0206-21#Text.
  19. Priester, M., Visscher, C., & Fels, M. (2020). Fibre supply for breeding sows and its effects on social behaviour in group-housed sows and performance during lactation. Porcine Health Management, 6, article number 15. doi: 10.1186/s40813-020-00153-3.
  20. Reznichenko, V.I., Lenkov, L.G., Lykhach, V.Ya., Lykhach, A.V., & Faustov, R.V. (2024). Increase of productive traits of sows with the use of the complex drug “Gepasorbex” in the conditions of industrial technology. Podilskyi Visnyk: Agriculture, Technology, Economics, 42, 47-54. doi: 10.37406/2706-9052-2024-1.7.
  21. Sapkota, A., Marchant-Forde, J.N., Richert, B.T., & Lay, D.C. Jr. (2016). Including dietary fiber and resistant starch to increase satiety and reduce aggression in gestating sows. Journal of Animal Science, 94, 2117-2127. doi: 10.2527/jas.2015-0013.
  22. Shang, Q., Liu, H., Liu, S., He, T., & Piao, X. (2019). Effects of dietary fiber sources during late gestation and lactation on sow performance, milk quality, and intestinal health in piglets. Journal of Animal Science, 97, 4922-4933. doi: 10.1093/jas/skz278.
  23. Slama, J., Schedle, K., Wurzer, G.K., & Gierus, M. (2019). Physicochemical properties to support fibre characterization in monogastric animal nutrition. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 99(8), 3895-3902. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.9612.
  24. Sun, H.Q., Zhou, Y.F., Tan, C.Q., Zheng, L.F., Peng, J., & Jiang, S.W. (2014). Effects of konjac flour inclusion in gestation diets on the nutrient digestibility, lactation feed intake and reproductive performance of sows. Animal, 8, 1089-1094. doi: 10.1017/S175173111400113X.
  25. Vargovic, L., Hermesch, S., Athorn, R.Z., & Bunter, K.L. (2021). Feed intake and feeding behaviour traits of gestating sows are associated with undesirable outcomes. Livestock Science, 249, article number 104526. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104526.