Economic and energy evaluation of sainfoin growing technology elements for green feed

G. Demydas, Е. Lyhosherst, I. Svystunova
Abstract

One of the main directions of intensification of the feed production industry is the cultivation of fodder crops and forage harvesting from them based on the use of economically feasible and energy-saving technologies. The aim of the research was to determine the influence of mineral fertilizers and seed inoculation on the economic and energy efficiency of sainfoin growing technology on green fodder. Experimental studies were conducted during 2016-2018 on the research field of the Department of Forage Production, Land Reclamation and Meteorology, located in the NULES of Ukraine "Agronomic Research Station" on typical low-humus chernozem. According to the results of the research, it is established that for growing sainfoin for green fodder the most profitable (176 %) is the variety Amethyst Donetskyi in the absence of fertilizer, however, application of mineral fertilizers in the dose N45R60K90 in combination with seeds inoculation by Rhizotorfin significantly increases crop yield, and the net profit. The best in terms of energy efficiency and energy efficiency ratio was the technological model of growing this variety of sainfoin, which did not provide for the application of mineral fertilizers or the application of only P60K90

Keywords

sainfoin, mineral fertilizers, inoculation, green fodder, economic and energy evaluation

Suggested citation
Demydas, G., Lyhosherst, Е., & Svystunova, I. (2021). Economic and energy evaluation of sainfoin growing technology elements for green feed. Scientific Reports of the National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, 17(6),86-94. https://doi.org/10.31548/dopovidi2021.06.007
References
  1. Holoborodko, S.P., & Sakhno, H.V. (2013). Sainfoin: A scientific review. Kherson: Atlant.
  2. Demydas, H.I., Svystunova, I.V., & Lykhosherst, E.S. (2018). Intensity of growth of vegetative mass of sainfoin depending on mineral species composition and mineral nutrition. Scientific Bulletin of NUBiP of Ukraine, 294, 16-24. https://doi.org/10.31548/agr2018.294.016.
  3. Kvitko, H.P., Polishchuk, I.S., Mazur, V.A., Protopish, I.H., Korniichuk, O.V., Hetman, N.Ya., & Demydas, H.I. (2013). Perennial grasses as a factor of stable development of agriculture in Ukraine. Agriculture, 85, 63-71.
  4. Chapliak, S., & Podlesnyi, M. (2014). Sainfoin: Low-cost and drought-resistant. Grain, 117-123.
  5. Gavrila, C.S., Silistru, D., Nazare, A.I., Stavarache, M., Vintu, V., & Samuil, C. (2020). The influence of fertilization and distance between rows on some sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) morphoproductive indicators. Research Journal of Agricultural Science, 50(2), 111-116.
  6. Huyen, N., Desrues, O., Alferink, S., Zandstra, T., Verstegen, M., Hendriks, M., & Pellikaan, W. (2016). Inclusion of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) silage in dairy cow rations affects nutrient digestibility, nitrogen utilization, energy balance, and methane emissions. Journal of Dairy Science, 99(5), 3566-3577.
  7. Huyen, N., Verstegen, M., Hendriks, W., & Pellikaan, W. (2020). Sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) silage in dairy cow rations reduces ruminal biohydrogenation and increases transfer efficiencies of unsaturated fatty acids from feed to milk. Animal Nutrition, 6, 333-341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2020.05.001.
  8. Kovalenko, V., & Perederiy, N. (2018). Economic basis for the creation of fodder base of the enterprise. In International Scientific Days 2018. Towards Productive, Sustainable and Resilient Global Agriculture and Food Systems. Conference Proceedings (pp. 840-850). https://doi.org/10.15414/isd2018.s3.10.
  9. Simonnet, X. (2012). Cultivation of fodder plant sainfoin. Forum Kleinwiederkäuer. Petits Ruminants, 5, 6-8.
  10. Tkachuk, O., & Vergelis, V. (2021). Nutrients yield of leguminal perennial grasses green mass depending on the vegetation features. Norwegian Journal of Development of the International Science, 61, 3-9.