Practical considerations in the selection of creatine forms for calf feeding

Dmytro Nosevych, Tetiana Antoniuk
Abstract

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the feasibility of adding different forms of creatine to milk and whole milk replacer. The following creatine sources were examined: creatine hydrochloride, creatine monohydrate, creatine phosphate, and creatine malate. Creatine preparations, at a dosage equivalent to 15 g per 6 L of milk, were assessed for water solubility and subsequently added to milk and milk replacer. Creatine hydrochloride demonstrated excellent water solubility and readily passed through the filter after mixing with milk. Amount of dry matter retained on the filters decreased by 0.2 g/L compared with milk, indicating improved filtration properties. After one hour of standing, the residue in the lower fraction remained 0.1 g/L lower than in the corresponding milk fraction. Creatine monohydrate remained insoluble in water but did not induce milk coagulation. Residue retained on the filters increased by 0.1 g/L compared with milk, while after one hour of standing the residue in the lower fraction increased by 0.5 g/L relative to the control. Creatine phosphate dissolved well in water; however, mixing with milk increased the residue on the filters by 0.1 g/L immediately after mixing, and after one hour of storage the mixture separated, forming protein coagulates. The residue retained on the filters in the lower fraction exceeded the control by 3.5 g/L. Creatine malate showed slower dissolution in water due to the presence of large agglomerates. In prepared mixtures with milk, the residue retained on the filters increased by 0.6 g/L compared with the control, and after one hour of standing the residue in the lower fraction exceeded the control by 5.3 g/L. Protein coagulates formed in the upper fraction of the mixture after one hour of standing, making it unsuitable for filtration. In mixtures with whole milk replacer, all forms of creatine slightly accelerated the sedimentation of suspension components; however, this effect was not critical. For calf milk mixtures, the inclusion of creatine hydrochloride was recommended due to its high solubility and lack of rapid milk coagulation

Keywords

milk; milk replacer; cattle; solubility; milk protein coagulation; esophageal groove reflex

Suggested citation
Nosevych, D., & Antoniuk, T. (2026). Practical considerations in the selection of creatine forms for calf feeding. Scientific Reports of the National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, 22(2),135-149. https://doi.org/10.31548/dopovidi/2.2026.135
References
  1. Amin, A.B., Trabi, E.B., Zhu, C., & Mao, S. (2022). Role of butyrate as part of milk replacer and starter diet on intestinal development in pre-weaned calves. A systematic review. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 292, article number 115423. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2022.115423.
  2. Antonio, J., et al. (2021). Common questions and misconceptions about creatine supplementation: What does the scientific evidence really show? Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 18(1), article number 13. doi: 10.1186/s12970-021-00412-w.
  3. Brosnan, M.E., & Brosnan, J.T. (2016). The role of dietary creatine. Amino Acids, 48, 1785-1791. doi: 10.1007/s00726-016-2188-1.
  4. Carter, R.E., Emenheiser, J.C., Zinn, S.A., Govoni, K.E., Felix, T.L., & Reed, S.A. (2025). Effects of milk replacer composition on growth and development of beef × dairy crossbred calves. Translational Animal Science, 9, article number txaf005. doi: 10.1093/tas/txaf005.
  5. Coelho, M.G., da Silva, A.P., de Toledo, A.F., Cezar, A.M., Tomaluski, C.R., Barboza, R.D.F., Virginio Júnior, G.F., Manzano, R.P., & Bittar, C.M.M. (2023). Essential oil blend supplementation in the milk replacer of dairy calves: Performance and health. Plos One, 18(10), article number e0291038. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291038.
  6. de Souza Pinheiro, J., Dornelas Silva, P.S., de Andrade, D.R., Veloso Tropia, N., Ramos Oliveira, T.P., Rezende Gesteira, J.M., Navajas Renno, L., Facioni Guimarães, S.E., & Marcondes, M.I. (2024). Can milk replacer allowance affect animal performance, body development, metabolism, and skeletal muscle hypertrophy in preweaning dairy kids? Journal of Dairy Science, 107(12), 10708-10723. doi: 10.3168/jds.2024-25230.
  7. EFSA FEEDAP Panel (EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed), et al. (2022). Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of guanidinoacetic acid for all animal species (Alzchem Trostberg GmbH). EFSA Journal, 20(5), article number e07269. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7269.
  8. Escalante, G., Gonzalez, A.M., St Mart, D., Torres, M., Echols, J., Islas, M., & Schoenfeld, B.J. (2022). Analysis of the efficacy, safety, and cost of alternative forms of creatine available for purchase on Amazon. com: Are label claims supported by science? Heliyon, 8(12), article number e12113. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12113.
  9. Fazio, C., Elder, C.L., & Harris, M.M. (2022). Efficacy of alternative forms of creatine supplementation on improving performance and body composition in healthy subjects: A systematic review. The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 36(9), 2663-2670. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003873.
  10. Górka, P., Budzińska, K., Budziński, W., Jankowiak, T., Kehoe, S., & Kański, J. (2021). Effect of probiotic and nucleotide supplementation in milk replacer on growth performance and fecal bacteria in calves. Livestock Science, 250, article number 104556. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104556.
  11. Guven, S., & Cimrin, T. (2023). Effects of adding natural additives to whole milk on performance, faecal, and blood parameters in suckling Holstein calves. South African Journal of Animal Science, 53(6), 774-783. doi: 10.4314/sajas.v53i6.01.
  12. Hazlewood, K.J., Zumbaugh, C.A., Jones, C.K., Atkinson, E.M., Tingler, H.L., Inhuber, V.K., Brouk, M.J., Antony, R.M., & Titgemeyer, E.C. (2024). Effect of guanidinoacetic acid supplementation on the performance of calves fed milk replacer. Animals, 14(19), article number 2757. doi: 10.3390/ani14192757.
  13. Kreider, R.B., Jäger, R., & Purpura, M. (2022). Bioavailability, efficacy, safety, and regulatory status of creatine and related compounds: A critical review. Nutrients, 14(5), article number 1035. doi: 10.3390/nu14051035.
  14. Liu, W., La, A.L.T.Z., Evans, A., Gao, S., Yu, Z., Bu, D., & Ma, L. (2021). Supplementation with sodium butyrate improves growth and antioxidant function in dairy calves before weaning. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 12, article number 2. doi: 10.1186/s40104-020-00521-7.
  15. Marszałek, M., Serzysko, T., & Sienkiewicz, W. (2022). Immunohistochemical study on the development of cholinergic and nitrergic nerve structures in the bovine esophageal groove. Polish Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 25(1), 165-174. doi: 10.24425/pjvs.2022.140853.
  16. Murillo, Z.-M., Cardona, G.-C., & Acosta, B.-L. (2022). Creatine hydrochloride versus creatine monohydrate. Differences in solubility, ergogenic effects, and body composition. Perspectivas En Nutrición Humana, 24(2), 233-246. doi: 10.17533/udea.penh.v24n2a06.
  17. Ostojic, S.M. (2021). Creatine as a food supplement for the general population. Journal of Functional Foods, 83, article number 104568. doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2021.104568.
  18. Sharpe, K.T., & Heins, B.J. (2021). Growth, health, and economics of dairy calves fed organic milk replacer or organic whole milk in an automated feeding system. JDS Communications, 2(6), 319-323. doi: 10.3168/jdsc.2021-0084.
  19. Shencon Corporation. (n.d.). Whole milk replacer Teliatko. Ultra active. Retrieved from https://shencon.com.ua/zameniteli_moloka/zamenitel_celnogo_moloka_telenokultra_aktiv.
  20. Stout, J.R., Kreider, R.B., Candow, D.G., Forbes, S.C., Rawson, E.S., Antonio, B., & Antonio, J. (2025). The birth of modern sports nutrition: Tracing the path from muscle biopsies to creatine supplementation – a narrative review. Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 22(1), article number 2463373. doi: 10.1080/15502783.2025.2463373.
  21. Tan, P., et al. (2021). Amino acids metabolism by rumen microorganisms: Nutrition and ecology strategies to reduce nitrogen emissions from the inside to the outside. Science of the Total Environment, 800, article number 149596. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149596.
  22. Terré, M., Tortadès, M., Genís, S., Cresci, R., Frongia, A., Verdú, M., & Blanch, M. (2022). Short communication: A milk replacer aversion model in calves to test flavour-masking effects. Livestock Science, 256, article number 104830. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2022.104830.
  23. Wax, B., Kerksick, C.M., Jagim, A.R., Mayo, J.J., Lyons, B.C., & Kreider, R.B. (2021). Creatine for exercise and sports performance, with recovery considerations for healthy populations. Nutrients, 13(6), article number 1915. doi: 10.3390/nu13061915.
  24. Wilms, J.N., Kleinveld, N., Ghaffari, M.H., Sauerwein, H., Steele, M.A., Martín-Tereso, J., & Leal, L.N. (2024). Fat composition of milk replacer influences postprandial and oxidative metabolisms in dairy calves fed twice daily. Journal of Dairy Science, 107(5), 2818-2831. doi: 10.3168/jds.2023-23972.
  25. Wu, D., Zhang, Z., Shao, K., Wang, X., Huang, F., Qi, J., Duan, Y., Jia, Y., & Xu, M. (2023). Effects of sodium butyrate supplementation in milk on the growth performance and intestinal microbiota of preweaning Holstein calves. Animals, 13(13), article number 2069. doi: 10.3390/ani13132069.