Scientific Reports of the National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine

Formation of maize grain quality indicators under the influence of seeding rates and field productivity zones

Lesia Harbar, Bohdan Vaskivskyi
Download article
Abstract

Maize grain quality is an important indicator of the effectiveness of agrotechnologies and is shaped by the spatial heterogeneity of soil and climatic conditions and the level of intra-crop competition. The aim of the study was to determine the effect of field productivity zones and variable seeding rates on yield and maize grain quality indicators, in particular test weight, thousand-kernel weight, starch, protein and fat content. Field experiments were conducted during 2023-2025 within three field productivity zones (high, medium and low), identified on the basis of long-term yield maps and spatial analysis. The experiment was established using five seeding rates: 65, 70, 75, 80 and 85 thousand seeds per hectare. The results showed that the productivity zone was the dominant factor in the formation of yield and grain quality indicators, while the seeding rate determined the degree to which the potential was realised within each zone. The highest average yield (11.3 t/ha) was obtained in the high-productivity zone at a seeding rate of 80 thousand seeds per hectare, whereas in the low-productivity zone the maximum values did not exceed 7.7 t/ha. Grain test weight and thousand-kernel weight decreased from high to low productivity zones, indicating a deterioration of grain filling conditions under limited resource availability. Starch content was higher in high-productivity zones (up to an average of 72.5%), while medium and low zones showed an increased concentration of protein and fat, reflecting an adaptive response of the crop to stress conditions and reduced yield. The obtained results confirm the feasibility of applying zonally differentiated seeding rates as a tool for simultaneous optimisation of maize grain yield and quality

Keywords

Zea mays L., grain quality indicators, test weight, thousand-kernel weight, starch, protein and fat content, variable-rate seeding, productivity zone

Suggested citation
Harbar, L., & Vaskivskyi, B. (2026). Formation of maize grain quality indicators under the influence of seeding rates and field productivity zones. Scientific Reports of the National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, 22(1),54-65. https://doi.org/10.31548/dopovidi/1.2026.54
References
  1. Anselmi, A.A., Molin, J.P., Bazame, H.C., & Corrêdo, L.P. (2021). Definition of optimal maize seeding rates based on the potential yield of management zones. Agriculture, 11(10), article number 911. doi: 10.3390/agriculture11100911.
  2. Babić, V., Nikolić, V., Babić, M., Kravić, N., Pavlov, J., Žilić, S., Čamdžija, Z., & Filipović, M. (2024). Elite maize lines having variability in quality parameters – a valuable starting material for grain quality-oriented breeding programs. Agriculture, 14(12), article number 2122. doi: 10.3390/agriculture14122122.
  3. Barabolia, O., & Kosenko, I. (2024). The impact of sowing time on corn yield capacity. Scientific Progress & Innovations, 27(1), 41-46. doi: 10.31210/spi2024.27.01.07.
  4. Birinyi, E., Kristóf, D., Hollós, R., Barcza, Z., & Kern, A. (2024). Large-scale maize condition mapping to support agricultural risk management. Remote Sensing, 16(24), article number 4672. doi: 10.3390/rs16244672.
  5. Convention on Biological Diversity. (1992, June). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_030#Text.
  6. Deines, J.M., Patel, R., Liang, S.-Z., Dado, W., & Lobell, D.B. (2020). A million kernels of truth: Insights into scalable satellite maize yield mapping and yield gap analysis from an extensive ground dataset in the US Corn Belt. Remote Sensing of Environment, 239, article number 112174. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2020.112174.
  7. DSTU 10840:2019. (2019). Grain. Method for determination of test weight (GOST 10840-2017, IDT). Retrieved from https://online.budstandart.com/ua/catalog/doc-page.html?id_doc=89079.
  8. DSTU 4117:2007. (2007). Grain and grain products. Determination of quality indicators by near-infrared spectrometry. Retrieved from https://online.budstandart.com/ua/catalog/doc-page.html?id_doc=85620.
  9. Dudka, M., & Yakunin, O.P. (2023). The formation of maize grain yield depends on the method of sowing and the density of the plants standing in the Northern Steppe of Ukraine. The Scientific Journal Grain Crops, 7(2), 76-84. doi: 10.31867/2523-4544/0261.
  10. Gheith, E.M.S., El-Badry, O.Z., Lamlom, S.F., Ali, H.M., Siddiqui, M.H., Ghareeb, R.Y., El-Sheikh, M.H., Jebril, J., Abdelsalam, N.R., & Kandil, E.E. (2022). Maize (Zea mays L.) productivity and nitrogen use efficiency in response to nitrogen application levels and time. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, article number 941343. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.941343.
  11. Havlin, J.L., Tisdale, S.L., Nelson, W.L., & Beaton, J.D. (2013). Soil fertility and fertilizers: An introduction to nutrient management (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
  12. ISO 12099:2017. (2017). Animal feeding stuffs, cereals and milled cereal products – guidelines for application of near infrared spectrometry. Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/standard/67352.html?utm_source.
  13. Kothiyal, S., Prabhjyot‑Kaur, Sandhu, S.S., & Kaur, J. (2023). Modelling viable adaptive options under climate change scenarios to increase maize productivity in Indian Punjab. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 16, article number 403. doi: 10.1007/s12517-023-11516-9.
  14. Lippold, E., Lucas, M., Fahrenkampf, T., Schlüter, S., & Vetterlein, D. (2022). Macroaggregates of loam in sandy soil show little influence on maize growth, due to local adaptations of root architecture to soil heterogeneity. Plant and Soil, 478, 163-178. doi: 10.1007/s11104-022-05413-5.
  15. Liu, W., et al. (2023). Spatial distribution of maize grain quality and its influence by climatic factors across China. Agronomy Journal, 115(5), 2439-2450. doi: 10.1002/agj2.21362.
  16. Łukowiak, R., Barłóg, P., & Ceglarek, J. (2024). Soil and plant nitrogen management indices related to within-field spatial variability. Agronomy, 14(8), article number 1845. doi: 10.3390/agronomy14081845.
  17. Munnaf, M.A., Haesaert, G., & Mouazen, A.M. (2022). Site‑specific seeding for maize production using management zone maps delineated with multi‑sensors data fusion scheme. Soil and Tillage Research, 220, article number 105377. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2022.105377.
  18. Ogunniyan, D.J., Adetumbi, J.A., Olasoji, J.O., & Makinde, S.A. (2021). The variability of grain yield, seed morphometric and vigour traits of early maturing hybrid maize. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 66(2), 105-119. doi: 10.2298/jas2102105o.
  19. Romero-Ruiz, A., O’Leary, D., Daly, E., Tuohy, P., Milne, A., Coleman, K., & Whitmore, A.P. (2024). An agrogeophysical modelling framework for the detection of soil compaction spatial variability due to grazing using field-scale electromagnetic induction data. Soil Use and Management, 40(2). doi: 10.1111/sum.13039.
  20. Sachan, D.S., Reddy, K.J., Sulochna, Saini, Y., Rai, A.K., Singh, O., & Laxman, T. (2023). Assessing grain yield and achieving enhanced quality in maize by next generation fertilizer: A review. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change, 13(8), 626-637. doi: 10.9734/IJECC/2023/v13i81991.
  21. Salem, H.M., Schott, L.R., Piaskowski, J., Chapagain, A., Yost, J.L., Brooks, E., Kahl, K., & Johnson-Maynard, J. (2024). Evaluating intra-field spatial variability for nutrient management zone delineation through geospatial techniques and multivariate analysis. Sustainability, 16(2), article number 645. doi: 10.3390/su16020645.
  22. Tadiboina, G.K., Maitra, S., Kalasare, R.S., Ray, S., Mahto, R.K., & Sairam, M. (2024). Influence of location-specific nutrient management and plant stand on the growth, productivity, and nutrient uptake of irrigated rabi maize (Zea mays L.). Research on Crops, 25(2), 560-569. doi: 10.31830/2348-7542.2024.roc-1140.
  23. Videgain, M., Martínez-Casasnovas, J.A., Vigo, A., Vidal, M., & García Ramos, F.J. (2024). On-farm experimentation of precision agriculture for differential seed and fertilizer management in semiarid rainfed zones. Precision Agriculture, 25(6), 3048-3069. doi: 10.1007/s11119-024-10189-y.
  24. Zhou, S., Zhou, F., Zi, X., Rao, D., Liu, K., & Wu, B. (2022). Responses of maize (Zea mays L.) roots to nitrogen heterogeneity and intraspecific competition: Evidence from a pot experiment using the “root splitting” approach. Agronomy, 12(12), article number 3101. doi: 10.3390/agronomy12123101.
  25. Zhou, S., Zi, X., Rao, D., Liu, K., Yang, L., Shen, P., Wu, B., & Zhou, F. (2024). Jasmonic acid mediates maize (Zea mays L.) roots response to soil nitrogen heterogeneity. Journal of Plant Biology, 67, 241-255. doi: 10.1007/s12374-024-09428-6.