Scientific Reports of the National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine

Identification and species composition of pathogens of sugar beet storage-pile rot in short-rotation cropping systems of the Western Forest-Steppe of Ukraine

Dmytro Kyselov
Download article
Abstract

The relevance of the study is conditioned by the increase in phytosanitary risks due to the intensification of land use and reduction of crop rotation. The purpose of the study was to determine the species composition and population structure of fungal pathogens that affect beet roots during growth and storage. The study was conducted at the production fields of the private enterprise “Zakhidnyi Buh” using standard Mycological methods (isolation, morphological identification, calculation of the frequency of species occurrence). The species composition of the main pathogens of sugar beet storage-pile rot in short-rotation cropping systems of the Western Forest-Steppe of Ukraine, among which fungi of the genus Fusarium dominate, has been established. It was determined that five species of phytopathogenic fungi dominate short-rotation cropping systems: Fusarium oxysporum (30%), F. solani (18%), Phoma betae (19%), Rhizoctonia solani (13%), and Botrytis cinerea (10%). Total share of the genus Fusarium accounted for about 48% of all isolates, which indicates its leading role in the development of root and storage-pile rot. Significant morphological variability of isolates was found, in particular, variations in colony pigmentation and sporulation intensity, which confirms the high ecological plasticity of pathogens. It was shown that F. oxysporum and Phoma betae had the highest isolation frequency, while B. cinerea occurred mainly in conditions of high humidity. The results obtained indicate an increase in phytopathogenic load in short crop rotations and the development of stable fungal populations with high adaptive potential. The necessity for developing integrated sugar beet protection systems aimed at reducing the phytopathogenic load in short rotations was substantiated. The results obtained can be used in crop rotation planning, improving storage technologies, and introducing biological controls (Trichoderma spp. antagonists)

Keywords

storage of root crops, biological control, mycological analysis, Fusarium oxysporum, Phoma betae, Rhizoctonia solani

Suggested citation
Kyselov, D. (2025). Identification and species composition of pathogens of sugar beet storage-pile rot in short-rotation cropping systems of the Western Forest-Steppe of Ukraine. Scientific Reports of the National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, 21(6),22-30. https://doi.org/10.31548/dopovidi/6.2025.22
References
  1. Aveskamp, M.M., De Gruyter, J., & Crous, P.W. (2008). Biology and recent developments in the systematics of Phoma, a complex genus of major quarantine significance. Fungal Diversity, 31, 1-18.
  2. Booth, C. (1971). Methods in microbiology (Vol. 4). New York: Academic press.
  3. Bose, T., Hammerbacher, A., Slippers, B., Roux, J., & Wingfield, M.J. (2023). Continuous replanting could degrade soil health in short-rotation plantation forestry. Current Forestry Reports, 9(4), 230-250. doi: 10.1007/s40725-023-00188-z.
  4. Convention on Biological Diversity. (1992, June). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_030#Text.
  5. English, W. (2023). Long-term post-harvest field storage of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris). (Doctoral thesis No. 2023:36, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp, Sweden.). doi: 10.54612/a.66e26trq96.
  6. English, W., & Jönsson, H.L. (2023). Quality and mass transport properties of sugar beet roots under short duration, high airflow post-harvest storage. Journal of Stored Products Research, 104, article number 102187. doi: 10.1016/j.jspr.2023.102187.
  7. Farhaoui, A., El Alami, N., Gachara, G., Ezrari, S., Khadiri, M., Tahiri, A., Belabess, Z., & Lahlali, R. (2023). Characterization and pathogenicity of Fusarium species causing sugar beet root rot in Morocco. Journal of Phytopathology, 171(10), 552-566. doi: 10.1111/jph.13210.
  8. Götze, P., Rücknagel, J., Wensch-Dorendorf, M., Märländer, B., & Christen, O. (2017). Crop rotation effects on yield, technological quality and yield stability of sugar beet after 45 trial years. European Journal of Agronomy, 82, 50-59. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2016.10.003.
  9. Hanhur, V., & Filonenko, V. (2023). Yield and quality of root fruits of sugar beet when grown in crop rotation with short rotation. Scientific Progress & Innovations, 26(3), 22-25. doi: 10.31210/spi2023.26.03.04.
  10. Hanhur, V., & Filonenko, V. (2024). Effect of soil cultivation systems and the degree of saturation of crop rotations with sugar beet on the level of yield and quality of sugar beet roots. Scientific Progress & Innovations, 27(1), 24-29. doi: 10.31210/spi2024.27.01.04.
  11. Ivanina, V.V., & Gurska, V.M. (2023). Formation of nutrient regime of leached chernozem in sugar beet agrocenoses depending on fertilization. Scientific Papers of Institute of Bioenergy Crops and Sugar Beet, 31, 69-75. doi: 10.47414/np.31.2023.292393.
  12. Jash, S., & Sarkar, A. (2025). Rhizoctonia. In N. Amaresan & K. Kumar (Eds.) Compendium of phytopathogenic microbes in agro-ecology (pp. 659-682). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-81770-0_28.
  13. Kalenska, S., Mazurenko, B., Novytska, N., & Melnychenko, V. (2025). Effects of seed treatment and foliar fertilisation by chelated fertilisers on the productivity of sugar beets (Beta vulgaris L.). Plant and Soil Science, 16(1), 23-36. doi: 10.31548/plant1.2025.23.
  14. Koch, H.J., Trimpler, K., Jacobs, A., & Stockfisch, N. (2018). Crop rotational effects on yield formation in current sugar beet production-results from a farm survey and field trials. Frontiers in Plant Science, 9, article number 231. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00231.
  15. Kusstatscher, P., Cernava, T., Harms, K., Maier, J., Eigner, H., Berg, G., & Zachow, C. (2019). Disease incidence in sugar beet fields is correlated with microbial diversity and distinct biological markers. Phytobiomes Journal, 3(1), 22-30. doi: 10.1094/PBIOMES-01-19-0008-R.
  16. Larney, F.J., Nitschelm, J.J., Regitnig, P.J., Pearson, D.C., Blackshaw, R.E., & Lupwayi, N.Z. (2016). Sugar beet response to rotation and conservation management in a 12-year irrigated study in southern Alberta. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 96(5), 776-789. doi: 10.1139/cjps-2016-0005.
  17. Leslie, J.F., & Summerell, B.A. (2006). The fusarium laboratory manual. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. doi: 10.1002/9780470278376.
  18. Li, M., Yang, F., Wu, X., Yan, H., & Liu, Y. (2020). Effects of continuous cropping of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) on its endophytic and soil bacterial community by high-throughput sequencing. Annals of Microbiology, 70(1), article number 39. doi: 10.1186/s13213-020-01583-8.
  19. Lin, M., Zhou, Y., Xu, R., Du, C., Wang, R., Lu, W., Abudukadier, K., & Sun, Z. (2023). Contrasting key bacteria and fungi related to sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) with different resistances to beet rot under two farming modes. Agronomy, 13(3), article number 825. doi: 10.3390/agronomy13030825.
  20. Majumdar, R., Kandel, S.L., Strausbaugh, C.A., Singh, A., Pokhrel, S., & Bill, M. (2024). Root microbiome and metabolome traits associated with improved post-harvest root storage for sugar beet breeding lines under southern Idaho conditions. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 25(23), article number 12681. doi: 10.3390/ijms252312681.
  21. Misra, S., et al. (2023). Outcomes in patients with poststroke seizures: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Neurology, 80(11), 1155-1165. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2023.3240.
  22. Roik, M., & Yaholnyk, O. (2024). Sugar beet in Ukraine: Crises, victory and prospects. Bioenergetics, 2, 4-8. doi: 10.47414/be.2024.No2.pp4-8.
  23. Strausbaugh, C.A. (2025). Incidence, distribution, and pathogenicity of fungi growing on sugar beet roots on top of outdoor piles in Idaho. Plant Disease, 109(7), 1478-1488. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-12-24-2663-RE.
  24. Summerell, B.A., Laurence, M.H., Liew, E.C., & Leslie, J.F. (2010). Biogeography and phylogeography of Fusarium: A review. Fungal Diversity, 44(1), 3-13. doi: 10.1007/s13225-010-0060-2.
  25. Williamson, B., Tudzynski, B., Tudzynski, P., & Van Kan, J.A. (2007). Botrytis cinerea: The cause of grey mould disease. Molecular Plant Pathology, 8(5), 561-580. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2007.00417.x.
  26. Wöber, D., Hansel-Hohl, K., Rohringer, S., Dokal, M., Antonielli, L., Imgenberg, W., Eigner, H., Seiter, M., & Molin, E.M. (2025). The role of microbial communities in maintaining post-harvest sugar beet storability. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 222, article number 113401. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2025.113401.
  27. Wolfgang, A., Temme, N., Tilcher, R., & Berg, G. (2023). Understanding the sugar beet holobiont for sustainable agriculture. Frontiers in Microbiology, 14, article number 1151052. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1151052.
  28. Zar, J.H. (1999). Biostatistical analysis (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.