The growth, development, and productivity of cowpeas are influenced by soil and climatic conditions, as well as cultivation techniques, particularly the optimal stand density, which requires scientific validation for the conditions of the Right-Bank Forest-Steppe of Ukraine. This research aimed to study the characteristics of growth and development of Vigna about stand density, to optimise the productivity of different varieties. Research methods included field experiments to study cultivation techniques and statistical analysis to evaluate the reliability of the results. The study, conducted between 2014 and 2016, examined the effect of standing density on two cowpea varieties (U-Cha-Kontou and Kafedralna) using four planting schemes (70×10 cm, 70×25 cm, 70×40 cm, 70×50 cm). It was found that standing density significantly affects the growth, development, phenology, and productivity of Vigna. Field germination rates ranged from 80.0% to 85.1% across the variants studied. It was noted that an increase in the sowing rate reduced the field germination of the varieties’ seeds. Differences in plant survival rates during the growing season were observed among the varieties. Extreme values of this indicator ranged from 83.6% to 87.8% for the U-Cha-Kontou variety, and from 87.7% to 91.0% for the Kafedralna variety. At a standing density of 29,000-36,000 plants per hectare, the onset of flowering in both varieties occurred later (24-27 June). Furthermore, the phases of flowering onset and fruit ripening were observed 2-3 days earlier than the control and the period from emergence to flowering lasted 46-51 days. The U-Cha-Kontou and Kafedralna varieties reached biological maturity on 27 and 22 August, respectively, at a standing density of 29,000-36,000 plants per hectare. The precocious plants were found in denser sowings of 143,000 plants per hectare, where the varieties’ growing season lasted 135-141 days. The research findings could be valuable for practical use by vegetable growers, breeders, and specialists interested in vegetable cultivation, storage, and processing
sowing schemes, field germination, plant survival rate, growth and development phases, technical maturity, beans
[1] Adigun, J.A., Adeyemi, O.R., Daramola, O.S., & Olorunmaiye, P.M. (2020). Response of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata, L., Walp) to inter-row spacing and weed competition. Agricultura Tropica et Subtropica, 53(2), 73-79. doi: 10.2478/ats-2020-0008.
[2] Animasaun, D.A., Oyedeji, S., Azeez, Y.K., Mustapha, O.T., & Azeez, M.A. (2015). Genetic variability study among ten cultivars of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp) using morpho-agronomic traits and nutritional composition. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 10(2), 119-130. doi: 10.4038/jas.v10i2.8057.
[3] Bastos, L.M., et al. (2020). Winter wheat yield response to plant density as a function of yield environment and tillering potential: A review and field studies. Frontiers in Plant Science, 11, article number 54. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00054.
[4] Bergamaschi, H., & Bergonci, J.I. (2017). As plantas e o clima: Princípios e aplicações. Lisbon: Agrolivros.
[5] Bobos, I.M., Sych, Z.D., & Komar, O.O. (2023a). Recommendations for the cultivation of asparagus cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. and ubip. and equipedalia (L.) Verdc.). Kyiv: National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine.
[6] Bobos, I.M., Sych, Z.D., & Komar, O.O. (2023b). Asparagus cowpea: Source collection material and cultivation technologies. Kyiv: National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine.
[7] Bondarenko, G.L., & Yakovenko, K.I. (Eds.). (2001). Methodology of experimenting in vegetable farming and melon growing. Kharkiv: Osnova.
[8] Cardoso, M.J., Melo, F.D.B., & Ribeiro, V.Q. (2018). Population density on cowpea cultivars with different growth habits in the Matopiba region. Revista Caatinga, 31, 235-239. doi: 10.1590/1983-21252018v31n127rc.
[9] Chen, R.F., Ji, M.F., Guan, J.W., & Deng, J.M. (2015). Advances and prospects in plant symmetric and asymmetric competition. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 39(5), 530-540. doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2015.0051.
[10] Convention on Biological Diversity. (1992). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_030#Text.
[11] Convention on the Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora. (1973). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_129#Text.
[12] François, E., Jacob, K., N’guessan, K., & Justin, K. (2022) Influence of the Year and growing area on maize (Zea mays L.) production in the Central and North-Central zones of Côte d’Ivoire (Departments of Bouake and Katiola). American Journal of Plant Sciences, 13, 1116-1125. doi: 10.4236/ajps.2022.138075.
[13] Giridhar, K., Raju, P.S., Pushpalatha, G., & Patra, C. (2020). Effect of plant density on yield parameters of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.). International Journal of Chemical Studies, 8(4), 344-347. doi: 10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i4f.10090.
[14] Gnamien, Y.G., Nanti, B.T.J.-I., Kouassi, N.J., Kouame, N., Ayolié, K., & Kouadioс, Y.J. (2023). Influence of seeding density on agronomic parameters of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) accession grown in Daloa, west center of Côte d’Ivoire. GSC Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 22(3), 039-048. doi: 10.30574/gscbps.2023.22.3.0102.
[15] Gustiningsih, D., Purnamawati, H., Lubis, I., & Syukur, M. (2023). Number of seeds and fertilization affect the morphophysiological characters and production of cowpea. Ecology Journal, 5(1), 19-26. doi: 10.59619/ej.5.1.4.
[16] Hatfield, J.L., & Prueger, J.H. (2015). Temperature extremes: Effect on plant growth and development. Weather and Climate Extremes, 10, 4-10. doi: 10.1016/j.wace.2015.08.001.
[17] Ishikawa, H., Batieno, B.J., Fatokun, C., & Boukar, O. (2022). A high plant density and the split application of chemical fertilizer increased the grain and protein content of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) in Burkina Faso, West Africa. Agriculture, 12(2), article number 199. doi: 10.3390/agriculture12020199.
[18] Kouam, E.B., Ngompe-Deffo, T., Anoumaa, M., & Pasquet, R.S. (2018). Preliminary study on character associations, phenotypic and genotypic divergence for yield and related quantitative traits among cowpea landraces (Vigna unguiculata) from the Western Highland Region of Cameroon. Open Agriculture, 3(1), 84-97. doi: 10.1515/opag-2018-0009.
[19] Monteiro, M.M.D.S., Bastos, E.A., Cardoso, M.J., Andrade, A.S.D., & Ribeiro, V.Q. (2017). Effect of water regimes and plant densities on cowpea production. Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical, 47, 432-439. doi: 10.1590/1983-40632017v4747908.
[20] Nderi, L.M. (2020). Effect of different spacing intervals on growth and yield of cowpeas varieties in Kilifi County, Kenya. (Doctoral Dissertation, Kenya Methodist University, Nairobi, Kenya).
[21] Nevhulaudzi, T., Ntushelo, K., & Kanu, S.A. (2020). Growth and nutritional responses of cowpea (cv. Soronko) to short-term elevated temperature. HortScience, 55(9), 1495-1499. doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI15132-20.
[22] Nleya, T., Schutte, M., Clay, D., Reicks, G., & Mueller, N. (2020). Planting date, cultivar, seed treatment, and seeding rate effects on soybean growth and yield. Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment, 3(1), article number e20045. doi: 10.1002/agg2.20045.
[23] Oliveira, S.D., Andrade Júnior, A.S., Ribeiro, V.Q., Brito, R.R., & Carvalho, M.W. (2015). Interação de níveis de água e densidade de plantas no crescimento e produtividade do feijão-caupi. Teresina, PI. Irriga, 20(3), 502-513.
[24] Oroka, F.O. (2017). Mineral fertilizer and inter-row spacing effects on vegetative growth, nodulation and dry matter yield of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. walp). International Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, 20(2), 3066-3073.
[25] Osipitan, O.A. (2017). Weed interference and control in cowpea production: A review. Journal of Agricultural science, 9(12), 11-20. doi:10.5539/JAS.V9N12P11.
[26] Rao, N.G. (2018). Statistics for agricultural sciences (2nd ed.). Hyderabad: BS Publications
[27] Schmidt, D., Zamban, D.T., Prochnow, D., Caron, B.O., Souza, V.Q., Paula, G.M., & Cocco, C. (2017). Caracterização fenológica, filocrono e requerimento térmico de tomateiro italiano em dois ciclos de cultivo. Horticultura Brasileira, 35(1), 89-96. doi: 10.1590/S0102-053620170114.
[28] Soratto, R.P., Matoso, A.O., Gilabel, A.P., Fernandes, F.M., Schwalbert, R.A., & Ciampitti, I.A. (2020). Agronomic optimal plant density for semiupright cowpea as a second crop in southeastern Brazil. Crop Science, 60(5), 2695-2708. doi: 10.1002/csc2.20232.
[29] Tehulie, N.S., Fikadu, T., & Purba, J.H. (2021). Response of mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] varieties to plant spacing under irrigation at Gewane, Northeastern Ethiopia. Agro Bali: Agricultural Journal, 4(1), 1-14. doi: 10.37637/ab.v4i1.613.
[30] Yalombe, N.G., Tshinyangu, K.A, Tshibanda, J.G, Mwamba, T., Lumpungu, K.C., & Yalombe, Y.Y. (2018). Effects of number of plants per stake with equity of planting density on cowpea yield in Mbujimayi, DRC. Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences, 36(1), 5825-5832.
[31] Yannick, U.S., Kidiata, M., Patrick, K.A.K., Luciens, N.K., & Louis, B.L. (2014). Effects of planting dates and spacing on growth and yield of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp) in Lubumbashi, DR Congo. International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies, 6(1), 40-47.
[32] Zaki, H.E., & Radwan, K.S. (2022). Estimates of genotypic and phenotypic variance, heritability, and genetic advance of horticultural traits in developed crosses of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata [L.] Walp). Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, article number 987985. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.987985.