Scientific Reports of the National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine

Common causes of abortion in cows

B. Nyzhnyk, O. Valchuk, T. Kataieva, D. Dreval, I. Derkach
Download article
Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine the etiology of abortion in cows. The study was conducted in the period from 2019 to 2022. 162 cases of abortion from 65 farms from 14 regions of Ukraine were investigated. The study used pathological, histological, bacteriological and molecular genetic methods. The etiologic diagnosis was established in 24.07% of cases, the probable etiologic diagnosis in 29.01%, and the diagnosis of abortion of uncertain etiology in 46.91% of cases. Abortions with a definite etiology were caused by bacteria in 30.77% of cases, viruses in 10.26%, protozoa in 28.21%, and mixed infections in 30.77%. Abortions with established probable etiology were caused by bacteria in 10.64% of cases, viruses in 25.53%, protozoa in 34.04%, and mixed infections in 29.79%. The most common infectious agents are: BHV-4 was detected in 11, N. caninum - in 9, and Coxiella burnetii - in 6 regions of the country. Zoonotic pathogens such as Leptospira spp., Coxiella burnetii, Salmonella spp. Neospora caninum is the most common cause of cattle abortion. The most common pathological changes recorded were placental edema, liver irregularity, unevenly colored liver, cerebral hyperemia, multiple white streaks in skeletal muscles, gray-white foci in the liver, hemorrhages in/on internal organs, and placentitis. Also, a significant number of fetuses and/or placentas were in a state of autolysis. The main pathologic changes were encephalitis, gliosis, pericarditis, myocarditis, endocarditis, myositis, hepatitis, pneumonia, and placentitis. Pathologic and pathohistologic examination of the fetus and placenta is important for establishing the etiology of abortion

Keywords

abortion, cattle, diagnosis, zoonoses, BHV-4, Salmonella spp., Coxiella burnetii, Neospora caninum, Chlamydophila spp., Campylobacter fetus, Leptospira spp.

Suggested citation
Nyzhnyk, B., Valchuk, O., Kataieva, T., Dreval, D., & Derkach, I. (2024). Common causes of abortion in cows. Scientific Reports of the National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.31548/dopovidi.1(107).2024.020
References

[1] Van Loo, H., Pascottini, O.B., Ribbens, S., Hooyberghs, J., Pardon, B., & Opsomer, G. (2021). Retrospective study of factors associated with bovine infectious abortion and perinatal mortality. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 191, article number 105366. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2021.105366.

[2] Moore, D.P., Cantón, G.J., & Louge Uriarte, E.L. (2021). Editorial: Infectious diseases affecting reproduction and the neonatal period in cattle. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 8. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.679007.

[3] Mee, J.F. (2023). Review‐ESDAR 2023 invited review: Bovine abortion – incidence, risk factors and causes. Reproduction in Domestic Animals. doi: 10.1111/rda.14366.

[4] Yadav, R., Yadav, P., Singh, G., Kumar, S., Dutt, R., & Pandey, A. (2021). Non-infectious causes of abortion in livestock animals - A review. International Journal of Livestock Research, 11(2), 1-13.

[5] Jonker, F. (2004). Fetal death: Comparative aspects in large domestic animals. Animal Reproduction Science, 82-83, 415-430. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2004.05.003.

[6] Wolf-Jäckel, G.A., Strube, M.L., Schou, K.K., Schnee, C., Agerholm, J.S., & Jensen, T.K. (2021). Bovine abortions revisited – enhancing abortion diagnostics by 16S rDNA amplicon sequencing and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 8, article number 623666. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.623666.

[7] Reichel, M.P., Wahl, L.C., & Hill, F.I. (2018). Review of diagnostic procedures and approaches to infectious causes of reproductive failures of cattle in Australia and New Zealand. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 5. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00222.

[8] Wani, A.K., Hashem, N.M., Akhtar, N., Singh, R., Madkour, M., & Prakash, A. (2022). Understanding microbial networks of farm animals through genomics, metagenomics and other meta-omic approaches for livestock wellness and sustainability. Annals of Animal Science, 22(3), 839-853. doi: 10.2478/aoas-2022-0002.

[9] Jonker, A., & Michel, A. (2020). Retrospective study of bacterial and fungal causes of abortion in domestic ruminants in northern regions of South Africa (2006-2016). Australian Veterinary Journal, 99(3), 66-71. doi: 10.1111/avj.13035.

[10] Vidal, S., Kegler, K., Posthaus, H., Perreten, V., & Rodriguez-Campos, S. (2017). Amplicon sequencing of bacterial microbiota in abortion material from cattle. Veterinary Research, 48(1), article number 64. doi: 10.1186/s13567-017-0470-1.

[11] Wolf-Jäckel, G.A., et al. (2020). Diagnostic studies of abortion in Danish cattle 2015-2017. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, 62(1), 1. doi: 10.1186/s13028-019-0499-4.

[12] Kaplan, M., Çağırgan, A.A., Pekmez, K., Arslan, F., & Kalaycı, G. (2022). Survey of four important viruses causing abortion in cattle in Aegean Region. Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 38(2), 101-107. doi: 10.15312/eurasianjvetsci.2022.370.

[13] Sodoma, E., Mitterhuemer, S., Krassnig, G., Stellnberger, K., Reisp, K., Schmoll, F., & Dünser, M. (2019). Infektiös bedingte Aborte beim Rind – eigene Erfahrungen und Untersuchungen aus dem Jahr 2018 (Januar-September). Tierärztliche Praxis Ausgabe G: Großtiere / Nutztiere, 47(03), 143-150. doi: 10.1055/a-0896-0945.

[14] Macías-Rioseco, M., et al. (2020). Causes of abortion in dairy cows in Uruguay. Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira, 40(5), 325-332. doi: 10.1590/1678-5150-pvb-6550.

[15] Seyedmousavi, S., et al. (2018). Fungal infections in animals: A patchwork of different situations. Medical Mycology, 56(suppl_1), S165-S187. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myx104.

[16] Gupta, A., & Pratap Singh, N. (Eds.). (2021). Fungal diseases in animals. Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-69507-1.

[17] Botta, C., et al. (2019). Bovine fetal placenta during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Veterinary Pathology, 56(2), 248-258. doi: 10.1177/0300985818806453.

[18] Cantón, G.J., et al. (2022). Spatial-temporal trends and economic losses associated with bovine abortifacients in central Argentina. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 54(4), article number 242. doi: 10.1007/s11250-022-03237-0.

[19] Mee, J. F. (2016). A practitioner’s guide to post-mortem examination of an aborted or stillborn calf. Livestock, 21(1), 38-43. doi: 10.12968/live.2016.21.1.38.

[20] Kumar, C.U., Mahajan, V., Leishangthem, G.D., & Bal, M.S. (2022). Pathological and molecular studies on diagnosis of infectious bovine abortions. Indian Journal of Veterinary Pathology, 46(2), 111-115. doi: 10.5958/0973-970x.2022.00018.9.

[21] Hecker, Y.P., González-Ortega, S., Cano, S., Ortega-Mora, L.M., & Horcajo, P. (2023). Bovine infectious abortion: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 10. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1249410.

[22] Agerholm, J.S. (2013). Coxiella burnetii associated reproductive disorders in domestic animals – a critical review. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, 55(1), article number 13. doi: 10.1186/1751-0147-55-13.

[23] Cvetojević, D., et al. (2016). Prevalence of Bovine herpesvirus type 4 in aborting dairy cows. Polish Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 19(4), 731-736. doi: 10.1515/pjvs-2016-0092.

[24] Headley, S.A., et al. (2022). Detection of bovine gammaherpesvirus 6 in tissues of aborted fetuses from dairy cows concomitantly infected by Histophilus somni. Microbial Pathogenesis, 169, article number 105621. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2022.105621.