Transformation of floodplain phytocenoses under anthropogenic pressure (Shyianka river)

Olexiy Angurets*, Tetiana Lehostaieva

olexiy.angurets@gmail.com

Abstract

The study examines the influence of abiotic and anthropogenic factors on the formation of phytocenoses within the floodplain territory of the Shyianka River (Dnipro city). The relevance of the research is determined by the high level of anthropogenic pressure on urbanised floodplain ecosystems and the insufficient understanding of the integrated effects of abiotic factors on the formation of their vegetation cover. The aim of the study was to identify relationships between the physicochemical parameters of aquatic and atmospheric environments and the structural and functional characteristics of plant communities. The research was conducted under field conditions using geobotanical and ecological methods, including water sampling and measurements of key quality indicators (pH, redox potential, dissolved oxygen content, mineralisation, electrical conductivity), as well as assessment of atmospheric air quality based on concentrations of CO2, NO2, formaldehyde, ozone, and particulate matter (PM2.5, PM10). The results indicate that hydrochemical parameters of water are close to neutral values, with adequate aeration and moderate mineralisation; however, significant variability in redox potential reflects spatial heterogeneity of environmental conditions. Elevated CO₂ concentrations and the presence of technogenic impurities in the air were detected. The floristic composition includes 18 species of vascular plants, of which 50% are introduced and invasive taxa, with dominance of ecologically plastic species. The synanthropisation index (0.50) corresponds to a high level of anthropogenic transformation. A clear relationship between physicochemical environmental parameters and vegetation structure has been established, manifested in an increased proportion of invasive species and the formation of a mosaic phytocenotic structure. The novelty of the study lies in the integrated combination of geobotanical analysis with the assessment of physicochemical parameters of both aquatic and atmospheric environments within a unified research framework. The obtained results expand current understanding of transformations in urbanised floodplain ecosystems and can be applied in environmental monitoring and the development of restoration measures

Keywords

plant communities; abiotic factors; urbanised ecosystems; invasive species, synanthropisation; environmental monitoring; air quality

Suggested citation
Angurets, O., & Lehostaieva, T. (2026). Transformation of floodplain phytocenoses under anthropogenic pressure (Shyianka river). Scientific Reports of the National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, 22(4),7-19. https://doi.org/10.31548/dopovidi/4.2026.07
References
  1. Arce, M.I., & Sánchez-Montoya, M.M. (2024). Identifying physico-chemical indicators to assess the ecological quality of Mediterranean rivers in their dry phase. Ecological Indicators, 168, article number 112748. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112748.
  2. Bulto, T.W., Alemu, T., Werku, B.C., & Ambelu, A. (2026). Effects of riparian vegetation on water quality and macroinvertebrates in the Gilgel Gibe tributaries, Southwest Ethiopia. Applied Water Science, 16, article number 112. doi: 10.1007/s13201-026-02794-1.
  3. Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats. (1979, September). Retrieved from https://www.coe.int/en/web/bern-convention.
  4. Dinca, L., Murariu, G., & Lupoae, M. (2025). Understanding the ecosystem services of riparian forests: Patterns, gaps, and global trends. Forests, 16, article number 947. doi: 10.3390/f16060947.
  5. Dubyna, D.V., Iemelianova, S.M., Dvoretzkyi, T.V., Dziuba, T.P., & Tymoshenko, P.A. (2019). Adventization of coenofloras of the classes of pioneer vegetation in Ukraine. Ukrainian Botanical Journal, 76(6), 499-510. doi: 10.15407/ukrbotj76.06.499.
  6. Hanna Instruments. (2015). Instruction manual HI98194/HI98195/HI98196 multiparameter meters. Retrieved from https://www.fieldenvironmental.com.
  7. Ivanova, N. (2024). Global overview of the application of the Braun-Blanquet approach in research. Forests, 15(6), article number 937. doi: 10.3390/f15060937.
  8. Kais, K., Gołaś, M., Suchocka, M., Ziemiański, M., & Kalaji, H.M. (2025). The role of urban trees in PM2.5 mitigation: Air quality assessment and absorption capacity comparison in Warsaw alleys. Journal of Soil, Plant and Environment, 4(2), 75-94. doi: 10.56946/jspae.v4i2.730.
  9. Li, Q., Yi, X., Wu, W., Yang, N., Gao, Y., Li, D., & Wang, X. (2025). Impact of flow regimes on riparian vegetation zonation and ecosystem functioning in the Three Gorges Reservoir. Water, 17(24), article number 3560. doi: 10.3390/w17243560.
  10. Liu, J., Zheng, B., & Li, J. (2025). The positive and negative effects of green space on PM2.5 concentrations: A review. Atmosphere, 16(11), article number 1235. doi: 10.3390/atmos16111235.
  11. Lykholat, Y.V., Khromykh, N.A., Ivanko, I.A., Matyukha, V.L., Kravets, S.S., Didur, O.O., Alexeyeva, A.A., & Shupranova, L.V. (2017). Assessment and prediction of the invasiveness of some alien plants in conditions of climate change in the steppe Dnieper region. Biosystems Diversity, 25(1), 52-59. doi: 10.15421/011708.
  12. Okorn, K., & Iraci, L.T. (2024). An overview of outdoor low-cost gas-phase air quality sensor deployments: Current efforts, trends, and limitations. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 17(21), 6425-6457. doi: 10.5194/amt-17-6425-2024.
  13. Orr, J.A., et al. (2024). Studying interactions among anthropogenic stressors in freshwater ecosystems: A systematic review of 2396 multiple-stressor experiments. Ecology Letters, 27(6), article number e14463. doi: 10.1111/ele.14463.
  14. Pabst, R., Dias, F.S., Borda-de-Água, L., Rodríguez-González, P.M., & Capinha, C. (2022). Assessing and predicting the distribution of riparian invasive plants in continental Portugal. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 10, article number 875578. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2022.875578.
  15. Paul, M.J., & Meyer, J.L. (2001). Streams in the urban landscape. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 32, 333-365. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.32.081501.114040.
  16. Pyšek, P., et al. (2020). Scientists’ warning on invasive alien species. Biological Reviews, 95(6), 1511-1534. doi: 10.1111/brv.12627.
  17. Seto, K.C., Güneralp, B., & Hutyra, L.R. (2012). Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(40), 16083-16088. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1211658109.
  18. Sgrigna, G., Sæbø, A., Gawronski, S., Popek, R., & Calfapietra, C. (2015). Particulate matter deposition on Quercus ilex leaves in an industrial city of central Italy. Environmental Pollution, 197, 187-194. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2014.11.030.
  19. World Flora Online. (2026). Retrieved from http://www.worldfloraonline.org.
  20. World Health Organization. (2021). WHO global air quality guidelines: Particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), ozone, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide and carbon monoxide. Geneva: World Health Organization.
  21. Yoezer, D., Hall, A., Horta, A., & Wassens, S. (2026). Conservation status and threats to freshwater forested wetlands: A global systematic review. Biological Conservation, 315, article number 111704. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2026.111704.
  22. Zavialova, L.V., Protopopova, V.V., Kucher, O.O., Ryff, L.E., & Shevera, M.V. (2021). Plant invasions in Ukraine. Environmental & Socio-economic Studies, 9(4), 1-13. doi: 10.2478/environ-2021-0020.
  23. Zhang, M., Fan, S., Li, X., Li, K., Xing, X., Hao, P., & Dong, L. (2023). How urban riparian corridors affect the diversity of spontaneous herbaceous plants as pollination and dispersal routes: A case of the Wenyu River-North Canal in Beijing, China. Ecological Indicators, 146, article number 109869. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.109869.
  24. Zhukov, O., Kunakh, O., Ruchiy, V., & Khrystov, O. (2024). Influence of the functional and morphological features of floodplain water bodies on the indicators of water quality. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 81(2), 554-569. doi: 10.1080/00207233.2024.2318135.