Biophysical aspects of anthropogenic noise impact on the auditory system of Felis catus in various ecological niches

Olena Martynova*

Slyvka_UNU@proton.me

Abstract

Anthropogenic noise is considered an important physical factor of the urban environment that may modify behavioural, neurophysiological and sensory responses in the domestic cat Felis catus. The aim of this study was to conduct a meta-analytical synthesis of scientific evidence on the effects of household, traffic, clinical and other anthropogenic noise on the auditory system of Felis catus in different ecological niches. The study used systematic literature searching, comparative analysis of experimental and clinical studies, qualitative meta-analysis, normalisation of acoustic indicators in dB, Hz and kHz, and synthesis of data on behavioural, cardiovascular, endocrine and neurological responses. Noise sources acting in the home, veterinary clinic, shelter, hospital environment and open urban space were examined. It was found that cats, owing to their broad hearing range and their ability to respond to high-frequency and ultrasonic stimuli, may show stress responses even to sounds perceived by humans as ordinary household noise or as relatively low-intensity signals. The results of the study showed that as noise frequency increased, cats experienced stress, and the functioning of their cardiovascular system deteriorated. Additionally, noise can affect the endocrine system, as stress leads to the release of excessive amounts of hormones, which in turn affect the functioning of the entire organism. There was also a deterioration in hearing due to an increase in the frequency at which sounds were perceived, which subsequently led to the development of symptoms of deafness. Thus, sounds that humans perceive as ordinary and everyday are stressful for animals and can influence changes in their behaviour. In addition, prolonged exposure to anthropogenic noise can cause deafness in animals, leading to complete or partial hearing loss. The practical value of the study lies in the possibility of using the obtained results by veterinarians, shelter staff, cat owners and bioacoustics researchers when designing acoustically environments for Felis catus

Keywords

domestic cat; frequency; external ear; stress; deafness; human activity

Suggested citation
Martynova, O. (2026). Biophysical aspects of anthropogenic noise impact on the auditory system of Felis catus in various ecological niches. Scientific Reports of the National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, 22(4),127-140. https://doi.org/10.31548/dopovidi/4.2026.127
References
  1. Aizawa, N., & Eggermont, J. (2006). Effects of noise-induced hearing loss at young age on voice onset time and gap-in-noise representations in adult cat primary auditory cortex. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 7(1), 71-81. doi: 10.1007/s10162-005-0026-3
  2. Arcangeli, G., Lulli, L. G., Traversini, V., De Sio, S., Cannizzaro, E., Galea, R. P., & Mucci, N. (2023). Neurobehavioral alterations from noise exposure in animals: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(1), article number 591. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010591.
  3. Barrios, F., Ruiz, P., & Damián, J.P. (2025). Tools for the approach of fear, anxiety, and stress in the domestic feline: An update. Veterinary Medicine International, article number 9109397. doi: 10.1155/vmi/9109397.
  4. Benz, P., Zablotski, Y., & Schulz, B. (2024). Evaluation of stress scores of healthy adult cats during barometric whole-body plethysmography and its correlation with measurement parameters. Animals: An Open Access Journal from MDPI, 14(15), article number 2249. doi: 10.3390/ani14152249.
  5. Duarte, C.M., et al. (2021). The soundscape of the Anthropocene ocean. Science, 371(6529), article number eaba4658. doi: 10.1126/science.aba4658.
  6. Eagan, B., Gordon, E., & Fraser, D. (2021). The effect of animal shelter sound on cat behaviour and welfare. Animal Welfare, 30(4), 431-440. doi: 10.7120/09627286.30.4.006.
  7. El-Dairi, R., Outinen, O., & Kankaanpää, H. (2024). Anthropogenic underwater noise: A review on physiological and molecular responses of marine biota. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 199, article number 115978. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115978.
  8. Feline ear issues. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.hahpets.com/articles/415646-feline-ear-issues
  9. Furgala, N., Moody, C., Flint, H., Gowland, S., & Niel, L. (2022). Veterinary background noise elicits fear responses in cats while moving freely in a confined space and during an examination. Behavioral Processes, 201, 104712. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2022.104712.
  10. Georgiou, S.G., & Galatos, A.D. (2025). Music as a perioperative, non-pharmacological intervention in veterinary medicine. Establishing a feasible framework for music implementation and future perspectives with a focus on the perioperative period of dogs and cats. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 12, article number 1672783. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1672783.
  11. Girao, M., Stilwell, G., Azevedo, P., & Carreira, L. (2024). The influence of noise level on the stress response of hospitalised cats. Veterinary Science, 11(4), article number 173. doi: 10.3390/vetsci11040173.
  12.  Green, B. (2021). Feline sensory systems. In Vonk, J. & Shackelford, T. (Eds) Encyclopedia of animal cognition and behavior. Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-47829-6_1757-1.
  13. Griffin, F.C., Mandese, W.W., Reynolds, P.S., Deriberprey, A.S., & Blew, A.C. (2021). Evaluation of clinical examination location on stress in cats: A randomised crossover trial. Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery, 23(4), 364-369. doi: 10.1177/1098612X20959046.
  14. Heffner, R., & Heffner, H. (1985). Hearing range of the domestic cat. Hearing Research, 19(1), 85-88. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(85)90100-5.
  15. Kerr, K.A. (2026). Can loud music harm a cat? Vet-reviewed info. Retrieved from https://www.catster.com/cat-health-care/can-loud-music-harm-a-cat/.
  16. Kight, C., & Wsaddle, J. (2011). How and why environmental noise impacts animals: An integrative, mechanistic review. Ecology Letters, 14(10), 1052-1061. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01664.x.
  17.  Kimura, M., & Eggermont, J. (1999). Effects of acute pure tone induced hearing loss on response properties in three auditory cortical fields in cat. Hearing Research, 135(1-2). doi: 10.1016/S0378-5955(99)00104-5.
  18.  Kleszynski, B. (2024). Deafness in cats: Causes, symptoms, and how to help your cat. Retrieved from https://www.petmd.com/cat/conditions/ears/deafness-cats-causes-symptoms-and-how-help-your-cat.
  19. Kok, A.C.M., Berkhout, B.W., Carlson, N.V., Evans, N.P., Khan, N., Potvin, D.A., Radford, A. N., Sebire, M., Shafiei Sabet, S., Shannon, G., & Wascher, C.A.F. (2023). How chronic anthropogenic noise can affect wildlife communities. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 11, article number 1130075. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2023.1130075.
  20.  Kruger, M., & Lomber, S. (2023). Ultrasonic hearing abilities of the domestic cat assessed with auditory brainstem responses. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 154(4), A21-A21. Retrieved from https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ASAJ..154A..21K/abstract.
  21. Kunc, H.P., & Schmidt, R. (2019). The effects of anthropogenic noise on animals: A meta-analysis. Biology letters, 15(11), article number 20190649. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2019.0649.
  22. Lowe, G. (2026). Reduced hearing in cats. Retrieved from https://petsvetcheck.de/en/symptoms/cat/reduced-hearing/.
  23. Lowrie, M., Bessant, C., Harvey, R. J., Sparkes, A., & Garosi, L. (2016). Audiogenic reflex seizures in cats. Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery, 18(4), 328-336. doi: 10.1177/1098612X15582080.
  24. Marlow, J. (n.d.). The amazing feline ear. Retrieved from https://www.petacoustics.com/blog/the-amazing-feline-ear.
  25. Martin, M., Gridley, T., Elwen, S.H., & Jensen, F.H. (2022). Assessment of the impact of anthropogenic airborne noise on the behaviour of Cape fur seals during the breeding season in Namibia. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 550, article number 151721. doi: 10.1016/j.jembe.2022.151721.
  26. Munzel, T., Kuntic, M., Daiber, A., & Sorensen, M. (2025). Transportation noise and cardiovascular health: Evidence, mechanisms, and policy imperatives. The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology, 29(10), 525-532. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2025.5755.
  27. Pelletier, C. (2019). Impact of anthropogenic noise on the welfare of zoo-housed animals. Retrieved from https://spectrum.library.concordia.ca/id/eprint/986042/.
  28. Pieniazek, R.H., Beach, R.K., Dycha, G.M., Mickle, M.F., & Higgs, D.M. (2023). Navigating noisy waters: A review of field studies examining anthropogenic noise effects on wild fish. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 154(5), 2828-2842. doi: 10.1121/10.0022254.
  29. Pocock, J. (2024). Things you didn't know about cats and their hearing. Retrieved from https://www.hiddenhearing.co.uk/hearing-blog/case-studies/cats-and-their-hearing.
  30. Slabbekoorn, H., Dooling, R.J., Popper, A.N., & Fay, R.R. (Eds.). (2018). Effects of anthropogenic noise on animals. Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-8574-6.
  31. Strain, G. (2017). Hearing disorders in cats: Classification, pathology and diagnosis. Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery. doi: 10.1177/1098612X17695062.
  32. Tateo, A., Zappaterra, M., Covella, A., & Padalino, B. (2021). Factors influencing stress and fear-related behaviour of cats during veterinary examinations. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 20(1), 46-58. doi: 10.1080/1828051X.2020.1870175.
  33. Taylor, S., St Denis, K., Collins, S., Dowgray, N., Ellis, S.L., Heath, S., Rodan, I., & Ryan, L. (2022). 2022 ISFM/AAFP cat friendly veterinary environment guidelines. Journal of feline Medicine and Surgery, 24(11), 1133-1163. doi: 10.1177/1098612X221128763.
  34. Terray, L., Petiteau, B., Dutilleux, G., Vanpeene, S., Amiard, P., Sordello, R., & Reyjol, Y. (2025). What is the evidence for the impacts of airborne anthropogenic noise on wildlife? A systematic map update. Environmental evidence, 14(1), article number 14. doi: 10.1186/s13750-025-00368-3.
  35. Torres-Bernal, F., Martínez-Burnes, J., Hernández-Avalos, I., Olmos-Hernández, A., Domínguez-OIiva, A., Reyes-Sotelo, B., González-López, C., Villanueva-Pereyra, D., & Mota-Rojas, D. (2025). Infrared thermography and physiological variables as methods for recognizing fear in domestic cats (Felis catus) using three pharmacological models: Cannabidiol, gabapentin, and synthetic facial pheromones. Veterinary Sciences, 12(6), article number 523. doi: 10.3390/vetsci12060523.
  36. Tsuer, I., Christie, B., & Ladd, L. (2022). Middle ear functional morphology of the domestic cat (Felis catus) and the domestic sheep (Ovis aries): A comparative study with two echolocating mammals (Globicephala macrorhynchus and Tadaridabrasiliensis mexicana). Ann Otolaryngol Rhinol, 9(5), article number 1301. doi: 10.47739/2379-948X/1301.
  37.  Welch, D., Shepherd, D., Dirks, K., & Reddy, R. (2023). Health effects of transport noise. Transport Reviews, 6, 1190-1210. doi: 10.1080/01441647.2023.2206168.
  38.  Weller, J.E., Flint, H.E., Hunt, A.B.G., Ellerby, Z., & King, T. (2024). Investigating the effect a single dose of cannabidiol has on measures of stress in cats when being transported in a carrier and meeting a novel person in an unfamiliar environment. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 11, article number 1476296. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1476296.
  39. Wright, A.J., et al. (2007). Anthropogenic noise as a stressor in animals: A multidisciplinary perspective. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 20(2), 250-273. doi: 10.46867/ijcp.2007.20.02.02.
  40. Your cat lives in a noisy world – what do cats hear? (2025). Retrieved from https://www.felinepurrspective.com/your-cat-lives-in-a-noisy-world-what-do-cats-hear/.