Causes and trends in pathological damage to common ash

Yulia Babych , Nataliia Puzrina
Abstract

Intensive dieback of Fraxinus excelsior L. in the Forest-Steppe zone of Ukraine has led to a significant deterioration in the sanitary condition of ash stands and increased the risk of losing their ecosystem stability, making this issue particularly urgent amid the simultaneous influence of pathogens and the activation of a complex of stem-damaging insect species. This study aimed to analyse the ecological role of common ash in forest ecosystems, as well as to assess the sanitary condition and causes of ash stand decline, particularly the impact of Hymenoscyphus fraxineus and Agrilus planipennis. The study employed methods of analytical review, synthesis of previous research, critical comparison of results obtained by different authors, and logical-structural generalisation to identify key patterns in the development of pathological processes in ash stands. It was established that common ash supports intensive nutrient cycling due to litterfall with a high content of calcium and magnesium, and the rapid mineralisation of organic matter, which supports soil fertility and understorey development. According to the analysed studies, more than 950 associated species have been recorded, including 44 obligate and 62 highly specialised organisms, demonstrating the ash’s importance for biodiversity. The loss of ash reduces the rate of organic matter mineralisation and disrupts the nitrogen and carbon balances in the soil. Analysis of the sanitary condition in the Right-Bank Forest-Steppe of Ukraine showed that the most severely affected stands are located in the Cherkasy and Vinnytsia regions, where the area of dieback exceeds 600 ha. The main degradation factors include infections caused by Hymenoscyphus fraxineus, damage by Agrilus planipennis, bacterial diseases, and the combined influence of saprotrophic fungi. The results also indicate a strong relationship between the intensity of damage and tree age, stand density, and soil type, which enables the identification of zones at the greatest risk

Keywords

Fraxinus excelsior L., Hymenoscyphus fraxineus, Agrilus planipennis, forest ecosystems, sanitary condition of forests

Suggested citation
Babych , Yu., & Puzrina, N. (2025). Causes and trends in pathological damage to common ash. Scientific Reports of the National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, 21(6),79-92. https://doi.org/10.31548/dopovidi/6.2025.79
References
  1. Agan, A., Drenkhan, R., Adamson, K., Tedersoo, L., Solheim, H., Børja, I., Matsiakh, I., Timmermann, V., Nagy, N.E., & Hietala, A.M. (2020). The relationship between fungal diversity and invasibility of a foliar niche – the case of ash dieback. Journal of Fungi, 6(3), article number 150. doi: 10.3390/jof6030150.
  2. Becker, R., Ulrich, K., Behrendt, U., Kube, M. & Ulrich, A. (2020). Analyzing ash leaf-colonizing fungal communities for their biological control of Hymenoscyphus fraxineus. Frontiers in Microbiology, 11, article number 590944. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.590944.
  3. Chandelier, A., Gerarts, F., San Martin, G., Herman, M., & Delahaye, L. (2016). Temporal evolution of collar lesions associated with ash dieback and the occurrence of Armillaria in Belgian forest. Forest Pathology, 46(4), 289-297. doi: 10.1111/efp.12258.
  4. Coker, T.L.R., Rozsypálek, J., Edwards, A., Harwood, T.P., Butfoy, L., & Buggs, R.J.A. (2019). Estimating mortality rates of European ash (Fraxinus excelsior) under the ash dieback (Hymenoscyphus fraxineus) epidemic. Plants, People, Planet, 1, 48-58. doi: 10.1002/ppp3.11.
  5. Davydenko, K., Borysova, V., Shcherbak, O., Kryshtop, Ye., & Meshkova, V. (2019). Situation and perspectives of European ash (Fraxinus spp.) in Ukraine: Focus on eastern borderBaltic Forestery, 25(1), 193-202.
  6. Davydenko, K., Skrylnyk, Y., Borysenko, O., Menkis, A., Vysotska, N., Meshkova, V., Olson, Å., Elfstrand, M., & Vasaitis, R. (2022). Invasion of Emerald Ash Borer Agrilus planipennis and Ash Dieback Pathogen Hymenoscyphus fraxineus in Ukraine – a concerted action. Forests, 13(5), 789. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13050789
  7. Díaz-Yáñez, O., Mola-Yudego, B., Timmermann, V., Tollefsrud, M.M., Hietala, A.M., & Oliva, J. (2020). The invasive forest pathogen Hymenoscyphus fraxineus boosts mortality and triggers niche replacement of European ash (Fraxinus excelsior). Scientific Reports, 10, article number 5310. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-61990-4.
  8. Drogvalenko, A.N., Orlova-Bienkowskaja, M.J., & Bieńkowski, A.O. (2019). Record of the emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis) in Ukraine is confirmed. Insects, 10(10), article number 338. doi: 10.3390/insects10100338.
  9. Fritsch, C., Grosdidier, M., Gégout-Petit, A., & Marçais, B. (2024). Mechanistic-statistical model for the expansion of ash dieback. arXivdoi: 10.48550/arXiv.2409.06273.
  10. Fuchs, S., Häuser, H., Peters, S., Knauf, L., Rentschler, F., Kahlenberg, G., Kätzel, R., Evers, J., Paar, U., & Langer, G.J. (2024). Ash dieback assessments on intensive monitoring plots in Germany: influence of stand, site and time on disease progression. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection, 131, 1355-1372. doi: 10.1007/s41348-024-00889-y.
  11. George, J.-P., Rusanen, M., Beuker, E., Yrjänä, L., Timmermann, V., Potocic, N., Välimäki, S., & Konrad, H. (2024). Lessons to learn for better safeguarding of genetic resources during tree pandemics: The case of ash dieback in Europe. arXivdoi: 10.48550/arXiv.2405.13305.
  12. George, J.-P., Sanders, T.G.M., Timmermann, V., Potočić, N., & Lang, M. (2022). European-wide forest monitoring substantiate the necessity for a joint conservation strategy to rescue European ash species (Fraxinus spp.). Scientific Reports, 12, article number 4764. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08825-6.
  13. Hultberg, T., Sandström, J., Felton, A., Öhman, K., Rönnberg, J., Witzell, J., & Cleary, M. (2020). Ash dieback risks an extinction cascade. Biological Conservation, 244, article number 108516. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108516.
  14. Jönsson, M.T., & Thor, G. (2012). Estimating coextinction risks from epidemic tree death: Affiliate lichen communities among diseased host tree populations of Fraxinus excelsiorPLoS ONE, 7(9), article number e45701. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045701.
  15. Kamińska, A., Lisiewicz, M., Kraszewski, B., & Wysocka-Fijorek, E. (2025). Assessing ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) dieback dynamics in the Białowieża Forest, Poland, using bi-temporal high-resolution remote sensing data. Forests, 16(3), article number 506. doi: 10.3390/f16030506.
  16. Kirisits, T., Matlakova, M., Mottinger-Kroupa, S., Mottinger‑Kroupa, S., & Halmschlager, E. (2010). Chalara fraxinea associated with dieback of narrow‑leafed ash (Fraxinus angustifolia). Plant Pathology, 59(2), article number 411. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2009.02162.x.
  17. Kowalski, T. (2006). Chalara fraxinea sp. nov. associated with dieback of ash (Fraxinus excelsior) in Poland. Forest Pathology, 36(4), 264-270. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0329.2006.00453.x.
  18. Kulbanska, I.M. (2015). Infectious and noninfectious pathology of common ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.)Scientific Bulletin of UNFU, 25(1), 75-80.
  19. Langer, G.J. (2017). Collar rots in forests of Northwest Germany affected by ash diebackBaltic Forestry, 23(1), 4-19.
  20. Lenz, H.D., Bartha, B., Straßer, L., & Lemme, H. (2016). Development of ash dieback in south-eastern Germany and the increasing occurrence of secondary pathogens. Forests, 7(2), article number 41. doi: 10.3390/f7020041.
  21. Liziniewicz, M., Tolio, B., & Cleary, M. (2022). Monitoring of long‐term tolerance of European ash to Hymenoscyphus fraxineus in clonal seed orchards in Sweden. Forest Pathology, 52(5), article number e12773. doi: 10.1111/efp.12773.
  22. Marçais, B., Kosawang, C., Laubray, S., Kjær, E., & Kirisits, T. (2022). Ash dieback. In F. Asiegbu & A. Kovalchuk (Eds.), Forest Microbiology: Forest Tree Health (Vol. 2, pp. 215–237). Academic Press. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-323-85042-1.00022-7
  23. Matsiakh, I., & Kramarets, V. (2020). Invasive phyllophagous insects in Ukraine. Proceedings of the Forestry Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 20, 11-22. doi: 10.15421/412001.
  24. Matsiakh, I., & Kramarets, V. (2014). Ash Dieback (Fraxinus excelsior L.) in Western UkraineScientific Bulletin of NLTU of Ukraine, 24.7. 67-74.
  25. Mazurchuk, H., Puzrina, N., Vasylyshyn, R., Bala, O., Karpuk, A., Melnyk, O., Khan, Y., Chemerys, A., & Babych, Yu. (2025). Investigation of ash stands’ health condition in emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire) infestation: Case study in Holosiivskyi District, Kyiv, Ukraine. Ecological Engineering & Environmental Technology, 26(12), 288-301. doi: 10.12912/27197050/214362.
  26. McKinney, L.V., Thomsen, I.M., Kjaer, E.D., & Nielsen, L.R. (2011). Genetic resistance to Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus limits fungal growth and symptom occurrence in Fraxinus excelsiorForest Pathology, 41(5), 454-463. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0329.2011.00725.x.
  27. McMullan, M., et al. (2018). The ash dieback invasion of Europe was founded by two genetically divergent individuals. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2, 1000-1008. doi: 10.1038/s41559-018-0548-9.
  28. Meshkova, V., Borysenko, O., Kucheryavenko, T., Vysotska, N., Skrylnyk, Y., Davydenko, K., & Holusa, J. (2024). Forest site and stand structure affecting the distribution of emerald ash borer, Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire, 1888 (Coleoptera: Buprestidae), in eastern Ukraine. Forests, 15(3), article number 511. doi: 10.3390/f1503051.
  29. Meshkova, V., Samoday, V., & Davydenko, K. (2021). Ash dieback and contributing factors of forest weakening in provenance tests in the Sumy region. Central European Forestry Journal, 67(2), 113-121. doi: 10.2478/forj-2021-0001.
  30. Mitchell, R.J., et al. (2014). Ash dieback in the UK: a review of the ecological and conservation implications and potential management options. Biological Conservation, 175, 95-109. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.04.019.
  31. National Forest Inventory. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.forestresearch.gov.uk/tools-and-resources/national-forest-inventory/.
  32. Nielsen, L.R., Nagy, N.E., Piqueras, S., Kosawang, C., Thygesen, L.G., & Hietala, A.M. (2022). Host-pathogen interactions in leaf petioles of common ash and Manchurian ash infected with Hymenoscyphus fraxineusMicroorganisms, 10(2), article number 375. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10020375.
  33. Orton, E., Brasier, C.M., Bilham, L., & Webber, J.F. (2018). Population structure of the ash dieback pathogen, Hymenoscyphus fraxineus, in relation to its mode of arrival in the UK. Plant Pathology, 67(2), 255-264. doi: 10.1111/ppa.12762.
  34. Petter, F., Orlinski, A., Suffert, M., Roy, A., & Ward, M. (2020). EPPO perspective on Agrilus planipennis (emerald ash borer) and Agrilus anxius (bronze birch borer). Forestry, 93(2), 220-224. doi: 10.1093/forestry/cpz045.
  35. Polk, S.L., Chan, A.H.Y., Cui, K., Plemmons, R.J., Coomes, D.A., & Murphy, J.M. (2022). Unsupervised detection of ash dieback disease (Hymenoscyphus fraxineus) using diffusion-based hyperspectral image clustering. arXivdoi: 10.48550/arXiv.2204.09041.
  36. Puzrina, N., Bala, O., Boyko, H., Sovakov, O., & Nosenko, Yu. (2025). Infestation of emerald ash borer Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) on the territory of National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine. Ukrainian Journal of Forest and Wood Science, 16(1), 8-22. doi: 10.31548/forest/1.2025.08.
  37. Pyvovar, T., Lyalin, O., & Meshkova, V. (2023). Causes and trends in defoliation of Fraxinus excelsior L. in Ukraine according to forest monitoring data. Scientific Works of the Forestry Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 24, 36-46. doi: 10.15421/412203.
  38. Richter, J., Erfmeier, A., Jansen, F., Mausolf, K., & Schrautzer, J. (2025). Identification of ash-associated understorey diversity – a lesson from historical vegetation records. Annals of Forest Science, 82, article number 30. doi: 10.1186/s13595-025-01304-8.
  39. Riutta, T., Slade, E.M., Bebber, D.P., Taylor, M.E., Malhi, Y., Riordan, P., Macdonald, D.W., & Morecroft, M.D. (2012). Experimental evidence for the interacting effects of forest edge, moisture and soil macrofauna on leaf litter decomposition. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 49, 124-131. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.02.028.
  40. Tkach, V., & Kobets, O. (2025). Current state of forests in Ukraine under the influence of climate change and military aggression. Forestry & Forest Melioration, 146, 3-13. doi: 10.33220/1026-3365.146.2025.3.
  41. Turczański, K. (2020). Site conditions for decline of ash stands in Europe. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum. Silvarum Colendarum Ratio et Industria Lignaria, 19(2), 67-73. doi: 10.17306/J.AFW.2020.2.7.
  42. Vasaitis, R., & Enderle, R. (Eds.). (2017). Dieback of European Ash (Fraxinus spp.): Consequences and guidelines for sustainable management. Uppsala: SLU Service/Repro.