Effect of mineral nutrition and nitrogen-fixing agent on maize yield in the Central Forest-Steppe of Ukraine

Oleksandr Dovhelia, Oleksandr Antonenko, Oleg Bachinsky, Fedir Melnychuk, Svitlana Alekseeva
Abstract

In modern agricultural production, there is an increasing demand for the use of biopreparations, particularly nitrogen-fixing agents, which can reduce the need for mineral fertilisers while enhancing maize yields. This study aimed to determine the effects of different fertilisation strategies and plant densities on the morphological characteristics and yield of maize under the agroecological conditions of the Central Forest-Steppe of Ukraine. Field experiments were conducted during 2023-2024 under the soil and climatic conditions of a farm in the Kyiv Region, using the maize hybrid P9255 (FAO 330). The area of each experimental plot was 33 m2, with four replications and a sequential multilevel arrangement. The application of a nitrogen-fixing biological agent in combination with mineral fertilisers had a positive effect on plant growth. In particular, plant height was 1.7%-5.1% greater than in the treatments where only mineral fertilisers were applied. An evaluation was carried out to determine the effectiveness and impact of optimising the fertilisation system on the morphological characteristics and productivity of maize plants through the use of a biological preparation in combination with mineral fertilisers at various application rates. Overall, the application of mineral fertilisers alone resulted in a 14.5%-22.5% increase in grain yield compared to the control. The highest yield, reaching 12.94 t/ha, was recorded under the N150P120K120 treatment at a plant density of 70,000 plants/ha. In treatments combining mineral fertilisers with the biological agent, grain yield was 12.2%‑21.2% higher than in the corresponding control variants. The highest average grain yield, amounting to 13.38 t/ha, was achieved with the N150P120K120 + nitrogen-fixing agent treatment at a plant density of 70,000 plants/ha. The application of the biological preparation in combination with mineral fertilisers produced a 3.6% (or 0.43 t/ha) higher grain yield compared to treatments without the biological agent

Keywords

biological preparation, plant density, plant height, mineral fertilisers, grain yield

Suggested citation
Dovhelia, O., Antonenko, O., Bachinsky, O., Melnychuk, F., & Alekseeva, S. (2025). Effect of mineral nutrition and nitrogen-fixing agent on maize yield in the Central Forest-Steppe of Ukraine. Scientific Reports of the National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, 21(3),37-48. https://doi.org/10.31548/dopovidi/3.2025.37
References
  1. Convention on Biological Diversity. (1992, June). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/995_030#Text.
  2. Didur, I.M., & Tsyhanskyy, V.I. (2017). Formation of corn grain productivity depending on the use of microbiological fertilizer Groundfix in the conditions of the Right-Bank Forest-SteppeAgriculture and Forestry, 7(1), 70-76.
  3. Dudka, M.I., Yakunin, O.P., & Pustovyy, S.I. (2020). The influence of foliar fertilization on the formation of grain productivity of corn when grown after sunflower. Tauride Scientific Bulletin. Series: Agricultural Sciences, 115, 42-48. doi: 10.32851/2226-0099.2020.115.6.
  4. Hovenko, R.V. (2022). Formation of elements of the structure the crop of corn hybrids under the influence of measures of cultivation technologyAgrobiology, 2, 68-78.
  5. Kamenshchuk, B. (2020). Ways of grain corn growing improvement. Feeds and Feed Production, 89, 85-92. doi: 10.31073/kormovyrobnytstvo202089-08.
  6. Kaminskyi, V., & Asanishvili, N. (2020). Features of growth and development of maize plants in crops and their photosynthetic activity depending on the growing technology in the Forest-Steppe. Foothill and Mountain Agriculture and Stockbreeding, 67(ІІ), 92-112. doi: 10.32636/01308521.2020-(67)-2-6.
  7. Len, O.I., Totskyi, V.M., Hanhur, V.V., & Yeremko, L.S. (2021). The effect of fertilization system and primary soil tillage on the productivity of corn hybrids. Bulletin of Poltava State Agrarian Academy, 2, 52-58. doi: 10.31210/visnyk2021.02.06.
  8. Lisoval, A.P. (2001). Methods of agrochemical research. Kyiv: National Agrarian University.
  9. López-Carmona, D.A., Alarcón, A., Martínez-Romero, E., Peña-Cabriales, J.J., & Larsen, J. (2019). Maize plant growth response to whole rhizosphere microbial communities in different mineral N and P fertilization scenarios. Rhizosphere, 9, 38-46. doi: 10.1016/j.rhisph.2018.11.004.
  10. Marchenko, T. (2019). Innovative elements of cultivation technology of corn hybrids of different FAO groups in the conditions of irrigation. In Natural sciences and modern technological solutions: Knowledge integration in the XXI century (pp. 135-152). Lviv: Liha Pres. doi: 10.36059/978-966-397-154-4/135-152.
  11. Mokrienko, V., & Kornienko, T. (2024). Formation of productivity of maize hybrids of different ripening groups in the Forest-Steppe region. Plant and Soil Science, 15(1), 52-62. doi: 10.31548/plant1.2024.52.
  12. Niewęgłowski, M., Sikorska, A., Gugała, M., Krasnodębska, E., & Zarzecka, K. (2024). The effect of nitrogen fertilization and the use of biostimulators on the chemical composition of grains of two varieties of corn (Zea mays L.). PLOS ONE, 19(12), article number 0311560. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311560.
  13. Rodrigues, M.Â., Correia, C.M., & Arrobas, M. (2024). The application of a foliar spray containing Methylobacterium symbioticum had a limited effect on crop yield and nitrogen recovery in field and pot-grown maize. Plants, 13, article number 2909. doi: 10.3390/plants13202909.
  14. Senyk, I.I., Onychko, V.I., & Naumov, Ye.O. (2023). The dynamics of the height of corn plant depending on the forms and rates of nitrogen fertilization in the conditions of the Northeastern Ukraine. Agrarian Innovations: Land Reclamation, Agriculture, Crop Production, 20, 69-75. doi: 10.32848/agrar.innov.2023.20.11.
  15. Shevchenko, L., & Tokmakova, L. (2018). Formation and productivity of photosynthetic apparatus of maize plants for the action of Polimiksobakteryn – a plant growth stimulator. Scientific Messenger of LNU of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies. Series: Agricultural Sciences, 20(89), 47-51. doi: 10.32718/nvlvet8908.
  16. Singh, R., Sawatzky, S., Thomas, M., Akin, S., Raun, W., Zhang, H., & Arnall, B. (2024). Micronutrients concentration and content in corn as affected by nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium fertilization. Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment, 7(4), article number 20568. doi: 10.1002/agg2.20568.
  17. Sydyakina, O.V., & Ivaniv, M.O. (2020). The influence of the mineral nutrition and the stimulator Zeastimulin on the productivity of corn grain under irrigated conditions in southern Ukraine. In Proceedings of the 1st international scientific and practical internet conference “integration of education, science and business in the modern environment: Winter debates” (Vol. 3, pp. 177-183). Dnipro, Ukraine.
  18. Tanklevska, N., Petrenko, V., Karnaushenko, A., & Melnykova, K. (2020). World corn market: analysis, trends and prospects of its deep processing. Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, 6(3), 96-111. doi: 10.22004/ag.econ.305555.
  19. Tkalich, Y.I., Tsyliuryk O.I., Kokhan, A.V., Yevtushenko, H.O., Gonzalez, P.H. (2023). Efficacy of growth regulators for maize fields. Agrology, 6(4), 97-103. doi: 10.32819/021116.
  20. Torres Vera, R., Bernabé García, A.J., Carmona Álvarez, F.J., Martínez Ruiz, J. & Fernández Martín, F. (2024). Application and effectiveness of Methylobacterium symbioticum as a biological inoculant in maize and strawberry crops. Folia Microbiologica, 69, 121-131. doi: 10.1007/s12223-023-01078-4.
  21. Trybel, S.O., et al. (2001). Methods of testing and application of pesticides. Kyiv: Svit.
  22. Tsyhanskyy, V. (2017). In Effectiveness even in drought. biofertilizers and corn productivityGrain: All-Ukrainian Journal of the Modern Agroindustrialist, 1, (pp. 71-75).
  23. Tsyliuryk, O.I., & Tyshchenko, V.O. (2024). The influence of plant density and mineral nutrition level on corn grain yield in the conditions of the Northern Steppe of Ukraine. Tauride Scientific Bulletin. Series: Agricultural Sciences, 137319-327. doi: 10.32782/2226-0099.2024.137.38.
  24. Ushkarenko, V.O., Vozhehova, R.A., Holoborodko, S.P., & Kokovikhin, S.V. (2019). Field experiment methodology. Irrigated agriculture. Kherson: ОLDI+.
  25. Wang, N., Zhang, T., Li, Y., Cong, A., Lian, J., & Feng, K. (2025). Integrated application of fertilization increased maize (Zea mays L.) yield by improving soil quality, particularly under limited water conditions in a semi-arid sandy area. Agricultural Water Management, 309, article number 109334, 1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109334.
  26. Zapałowska, A., & Jarecki, W. (2024). The impact of using different types of compost on the growth and yield of corn. Sustainability, 16, article number 511. doi: 10.3390/su16020511.
  27. Zinchenko, O.I., Salatenko, V.N., & Bilonozhko, M.A. (2001). Crop production. Kyiv: Ahrarna osvita.