Environmental plasticity and stability of corn hybrids during selection for grain quality

R. Spriazhka, V. Zhemoida
Abstract

Determination of ecological stability is an integral part of ecological variety testing of agricultural crops varieties and hybrids. Thanks to the obtained data, it is possible to draw conclusions about the endurance, adaptive potential and adaptability to growing conditions of new corn hybrids. Determination of the environmental conditions index, coefficients of ecological plasticity and stability provide a basis for recommending corn hybrids when grown in certain ecological-geographical and soil-climatic conditions. Testing of experimental corn hybrids in 2021 was carried out in three locations: a separate subdivision of the National University of Life and Environmental Science of Ukraine "Agronomic Research Station" (Bilotserkivskyi district, Kyiv region); limited liability company "Agrofirma "Kolos" (Skyrsky district of the Kyiv region); National Center of Plant Genetic Resources of Ukraine (Kharkiv district, Kharkiv region). The research material was 8 experimental corn hybrids, the parent forms of which are inbred lines VK13, VK69 and AE801. The index of environmental conditions, coefficients of ecological plasticity and stability were calculated according to the Eberhart-Russell method. The average yield of the studied hybrids in the conditions of the Agronomic Research Station of the NULES of Ukraine was 5.24 t/ha, in the conditions of the Agrofirma Kolos LLC – 6.04 t/ha, and in the conditions of the National Agricultural Research Service of Ukraine – 8.24 t/ha. It was established that the optimal conditions for the growth and development of corn plants in 2021 were in the experimental fields of the National Agricultural Research Service of Ukraine with an index of environmental conditions of 0.38. The coefficient of ecological plasticity (linear regression), which determines the reaction of hybrids to the improvement of growing conditions, varied from 2.2 to 5.9. The best indicators of this coefficient were noted in hybrids AE801xVK13 and VK13xAK159. The coefficient of ecological stability (root mean square deviation) was close to zero, which indicates the ability of experimental corn hybrids to form productivity regardless of environmental conditions. An exception is the VK69xUKHK667 hybrid with a coefficient (σd2) of 1.85 – it needs optimal growing conditions to realize its yield potential

Keywords

corn, inbred line, hybrid, index of environmental conditions, plasticity, stability

Suggested citation
Spriazhka, R., & Zhemoida, V. (2022). Environmental plasticity and stability of corn hybrids during selection for grain quality. Scientific Reports of the National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, 18(5). https://doi.org/10.31548/dopovidi2022.05.007
References
  1. Rodriguez, V.M., Butron, A., & Malvar, R.A. (2008). Quantitative trait loci for cold tolerance in the maize IBM population. International Journal of Plant Science, 169, 551-556.
  2. Dwivedi, S.L., Ceccarelli, S., Blair, M.W., Upadhyaya, H.D., Are, A.K., & Ortiz, R. (2016). Landrace germplasm for improving yield and abiotic stress adaptation. Trends in Plant Science, 21, 31-42.
  3. Krasnovskyi, S.A. (2017). Breeding value of inbred lines of corn as components of cold-resistant high-yielding hybrids. Kyiv. 26 p.
  4. Schnable, P.S., Ware, D., Fulton, R.S., Stein, J.C., Wei, F., Pasternak, S., Liang, C., Zhang, J., Fulton, L., & Graves, T.A. (2009). The B73 maize genome: Complexity, diversity, and dynamics. Science, 326(5956), 1112-1115.
  5. Liu, H., Wang, X., Warburton, M.L., Wen, W., Jin, M., Deng, M., Liu, J., Tong, H., Pan, Q., & Yang, X. (2015). Genomic, transcriptomic, and phenomic variation reveals the complex adaptation of modern maize breeding. Molecular Plant, 8(6), 871-884.
  6. Nelimor, C., Badu-Apraku, B., Tetteh, A.Y., & N'guetta, A.S.P. (2019). Assessment of genetic diversity for drought, heat and combined drought and heat stress tolerance in early maturing maize landraces. Plants, 8, 518.
  7. Detsyna, A.A., Yllaryonova, Y.V., & Shcherbynyna, V.O. (2019). Evaluation of ecological plasticity and stability of large-fruited sunflower varieties. Oil Crops, 3(179), 35-39.
  8. Filipov, H.L., Vyshnevskyi, M.V., & Maksymova, L.O. (1996). Physiological evaluation of the susceptibility of the corn material to root wilting and thickening. Bulletin of the Grain State Institute, 1, 43-47.
  9. Filipov, H.L., Vyshnevskyi, M.V., & Maksymova, L.O. (2001). Effectiveness of physiological diagnosis and selection of breeding material of corn for adaptability. Physiology of Plants in Ukraine on the Verge of Millennia, 2, 220-224.
  10. Voskoboinyk, O.V. (2005). Evaluation of the grain yield stability of corn hybrids under different ecofactors of the environment. Bulletin of the Institute of Grain Management of the Ukrainian Academy of Sciences, 26-27, 82-86.
  11. Kravchenko, R.V. (2012). Adaptability and stability of manifestation of yield properties of corn hybrids against the background of anthropogenic factors. Scientific Journal KubSAU, 77(03), 1-15.
  12. Pigliucci, M. (2005). Evolution of phenotypic plasticity: Where are we going now? Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 20(9), 481-486.
  13. Kusmec, A., Srinivasan, S., Nettleton, D., & Schnable, P.S. (2017). Distinct genetic architectures for phenotype means and plasticities in Zea mays. Nature Plants, 3(9), 715-723.
  14. Dospekhov, B.A. (2014). Field experience methodology (with the basics of statistical processing of research results). Moscow: Alians. 351 p.
  15. Tkachyk, S.O., Prysiazhniuk, O.I., & Leshchuk, N.V. (2016). Methodology for conducting a qualification examination of varieties of plants for applicability to broadening in Ukraine. General part. Vinnitsa. 119 p.
  16. Eberhart, S.A., & Russell, W.A. (1966). Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Science, 36-40.
  17. Bagatchenko, V.V., Zhemoyda, V.L., & Spriazhka, R.O. (2019). Formation of fractional composition and sowing quality of seeds, parental components of maize depending on density. Plant and Soil Science, 11(1), 79-87.